MARK SURMAN, PRESIDENT, MOZILLA Keeping the internet, and the content that makes it a vital and vibrant part of our global society, free and accessible has

  • LWD
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There’s actually a whole group called the Acceptable Ads Committee who decides on making advertisements distinct and unintrusive… But they don’t have any policies regarding privacy invasion.

    They also partner with popular ad blocking software developers, such as AdBlock Plus.

    They also have eight members, via their other name “eyeo”, on the W3C PATCG committee (alongside Mozilla, Facebook, Google, more ad companies).

    • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      all the groups you cited? are they just toothless and making no impact because it happened way too late? or do they just have a very trash deginition of what is intrusive? The major players still intrude all they like the second adblock isn’t there.

      by the time ablock plus’s author tried to meet in a middleground advertising was already so far out of control that the users said “f that, no more” and most of us moved to ublock origin. these pricks need regulated into submission but it’ll never happen.

      if it became reasonable, I’d turn off my blocking. ain’t gonna happen and we all know it no use pretending these companies are gping to back off thier tactics.

      • LWD
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        It’s worse: I would say every group is malicious. Ad companies try to look like they are policing themselves, in the hopes that they don’t suffer external regulation. But back when AdBlock Plus started this nonsense, people made uBlock Origin in response. People wouldn’t just take the ad industry at its word.

        Now… For some reason, people have changed their minds.