I think it’s worth considering the content and responding to that, though. Otherwise we may commit the logical fallacy of an ad hominem attack. In this case I think the article is a good one - it’s a legitimate problem without a good solution for Harris.

The best I’ve been able to come up with is for a national referendum of some sort post-election, which would allow Harris to plausibly support both camps and win both sets of votes while later saying that her policies are based on the referendum results.