Ex-Linus Tech Tips employee alleges mistreatment and poor conditions: “no one gets a break” - Dexerto::undefined

  • _danny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I do think a healthy amount of scepticism is healthy here. Her accusations are worded very carefully to not directly target anyone in particular and there is no proof of her accusations nor any way for LMG to dispute her claims because of how they are worded. Regardless of the timing. It’s all a little too convenient.

    That said, scepticism doesn’t mean blind faith in LMG, and it doesn’t mean tearing down the accuser. The new CEO getting an independent investigation is the best thing possible and we should hold our judgement until the result of that investigation.

    Edit: made my point regarding the timing more clear.

    I’m glad to see lemmy so active, even if it is negatively against my comment

    • PoliticalAgitator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not to even mention the timing. It’s all a little too convenient.

      The “timing” is “while everybody is discussing the issues within LTT”. That’s a completely reasonable time for an ex-employee to contribute their views.

      If you’re presenting “how conversations work” as suspicious, I don’t think that skepticism is healthy at all.

      • _danny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to play semantics like the insanely bad take from Linus, but this isn’t just a conversation, her accusations are serious.

        I was clearly being unclear, the timing isn’t important here. The me too movement showed that a lot of people who faced some of the same things she did stayed quiet for years.

        • PoliticalAgitator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What point were you wanting people to take away from your comment? Because it seems like it’s supposed to be “people with preferred pronouns can’t be trusted and will just make up stories about sexual assault”.

        • aStonedSanta
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait. You are generalizing her as negative because she prefers to be called they? Lol human beings a fucking idiots.

    • Xavier@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      In that case, what would you consider to be a suitable “timing” then?

      Is it just after a victim (children/teenagers/men/women/anyone) was verbally/physically assaulted? Within an hour? Within 24/48/72 hours? A week? A month? A year?

      When is the appropriate inconvenient (in contrast to your “too convenient”) time for you?

      Whether the victim feels safe or not, ready or not, supported or not, free of any retaliation or not, when is it too late for a victim to speak out or tell their story? Is 2 years already too much? How about 5 years, 10 years or 20 years?

      • _danny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was being unclear about my opinion on the timing. I meant to say take the timing out of the equation all together.

        But yes, as a relative of someone who has been assaulted and sexually assaulted, my opinion is speak out loudly and immediately when faced with this kind of stuff. Every minute you waste speaking out is another minute the assaulter roams free. I get that some may be uncomfortable with that, and they should speak out as soon as they are emotionally able to.