We’ve been anticipating it for years, and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the extension will soon no longer be available because it “doesn’t follow the best practices for Chrome extensions”.

Now that it is finally happening, many seem to be oddly resigned to the idea that Google is taking away the best and most powerful ad content blocker available on any web browser today, with one article recommending people set up a DNS based content blocker on their network 😒 – instead of more obvious solutions.

I may not have blogged about this but I recently read an article from 1999 about why Gopher lost out to the Web, where Christopher Lee discusses the importance of the then-novel term “mind share” and how it played an important part in dictating why the web won out. In my last post, I touched on the importance of good information to democracies – the same applies to markets (including the browser market) – and it seems to me that we aren’t getting good information about this topic.

This post is me trying to give you that information, to help increase the mind share of an actual alternative. Enjoy!

  • Hannes@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Vivaldi has that, too, without the cryptobro People owning the browser.

    I switched to Zen, personally as any chromium seems to be doomed unless someone manages to fork the base project and take it away from Google

        • Mwa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          It’s their opinion on crypto

          • Hannes@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            28 days ago

            Yeah - and they explain why they’ll never do a crypto currency. I don’t see how this is challenging anything I said before

    • lastweakness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Vivaldi is closed source. Brave isn’t. Even with all its very real problems, Brave is the best option aside from Firefox, especially once you turn off all the weird stuff

      • Mwa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        vivaldi has components open source but the ui is non-free

        • lastweakness@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          That’s essentially the same as not being open source considering the only part that’s open source is the engine code, which is mostly just chromium

          • Mwa
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            i am talking about this, You cannot compile it from source tho.
            this is why vivaldis ui is not open source

            • lastweakness@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              Yes, I’m aware, that’s what I was talking about too. As much as I love Vivaldi and want to trust them, i don’t think i can trust them as easily as Brave