• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Maybe non-profit would be best. Incentives to encourage good journalism, but not trying to raise the bottom line every year, chopping costs and spamming mass amounts of AI garbage because I’d bet 100 shitty articles is worth more than 1 good article for their bottom line.

    Easy access links to the journalists other works, peer reviews from other non-profit and about me profiles can also help people discern bias.

    I’m no expert though, so I’m sure someone has tried it and found making money is better for their paychecks

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What if it already exists, but you, like many others, don’t read it and instead continue to passively consume the very media you’re complaining about? Making better journalism doesn’t mean multiple generations of people hooked on social-media-feed dopamine hits will read it.

      • kofe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m subbed to my local NPR’s daily top news stories. Highly recommend folks in the US look to see if their local station has a similar program or find the closest one.