When I look at https://lemmy.ml/c/startrek vs https://kbin.social/m/startrek I see two entirely different lists of posts. Why? It’s the same topic, just on different instances. How can we have communities about topics without having them siloed into their own instance-based communities? Is this just related to that 0.18 issue with Lemmy/kbin not talking nicely, or is this how the Fediverse is?

Is it (at least theoretically) possible for me to post an article on https://kbin.social/m/startrek and have it automatically show up on https://lemmy.ml/c/startrek, or are they always going to be two separate communities?

  • timbervale@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I understand they are two different communities, I was just hoping it was a bug with Lemmy and kbin not talking to each other properly. The reason Reddit/Facebook/et al are so huge is because people want to have a single community to talk with, not 15 little communities all having their own discussions. I get the appeal of that, but if I wanted to join a small forum I’d go to startrekforum.com or something like that. We already have sites that offer small communities; what we needed was a replacement for Reddit. For the moment, it appears that Reddit is still the best way to be part of a large community, and that’s sad for people like me that just want a large community without having to rely on one website to host that community. Oh well.

    • retronautickz@fedi196.gay
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We already have sites that offer small communities; what we needed was a replacement for Reddit.

      The thing is neither Lemmy not kbin were made to be Reddit replacements.

      The reason Reddit/Facebook/et al are so huge is because people want to have a single community to talk with

      They’re also centralised and their respective servers can tolerate much more content being shared/posted onto them than a fediverse server can. Having different communities allows for a given server not to be saturated.

      Idk why there are so many general use instances when the threadiverse would be a great place for themed instances to exist. But even with thematic instances you can’t avoid similar communities existing (because multiples servers could exist for the same topic/fandom/etc.

      Something that connects communities about the same topic from different servers into a “macro-community”, so everything posted in any of the communities can be read when you click one of them, without putting to much pressure into a sole server, would be cool. But I don’t think is posible with AP alone.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk why there are so many general use instances when the threadiverse would be a great place for themed instances to exist.

        I would suspect that it’s because when these instances were coming online a week or two back there weren’t any other instances around, so having them be general-purpose was good. The Threadiverse can’t “afford” special-purpose instances until there’s already a large number of people around.

        • timbervale@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It also could be that people want their instance to be the instance for that community, or they want to be in control of the community, not someone else. It’s also one of the concerns I have about user impersonation (having a @timbervale, a @timbervale, and a @timbervale could lead to a whole bunch of confusion).

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t matter if an instance wants their instance to be “the” instance for a community, they don’t get to decide that for the whole Fediverse. It’s up to the users.

            It’s also one of the concerns I have about user impersonation

            Usernames should be interpreted in the same context as email address. I am FaceDeer@kbin.social, the “@kbin.social” part is as much a part of my username as the “FaceDeer” part.

            The UI should probably be displaying it more prominently than it is, that’s a bug that Kbin should resolve at some point.

            • timbervale@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re right, but the current tradition and momentum are towards using short display names; virtually every service that has a public-facing feature uses display names (even most email clients put the first and last name of the users instead of their actual email addresses).

              We definitely should be using the full bit on kbin/lemmy, though, as it’s so critical to the idea of the Fediverse, you’re 100% correct on that.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The current tradition may simply have to change when it comes to the Fediverse, because the Fediverse doesn’t work that way. It can’t work that way because instances are independent of each other. There’s no central authority that can decide which one gets to have the “startrek” community name or the “FaceDeer” username.

                If you want there to be a central authority to decide that stuff, then you don’t want the Fediverse.