• Evil_Shrubbery
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Same reasons as railway I suppose - its expensive to destroy a city centre to get the land needed for it.

      But you started the comparison with the underground thing.

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        But the city already has highways. If we started fresh sure let’s do more rail.

        My point is just, what infrastructure can you do with say <$1b? It’s a lot of money but not building a whole new railroad kind of money. You can get a few station upgrade projects, a couple of electric trains, etc.

        There’s room for private funding of a new electric car company. Save the tax dollars for big infrastructure projects.