• niu tech@fosstodon.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    @jon@vivaldi.net Well done @mozilla@mozilla.social - lay off advocates, save money for your CEO! Who cares about popularity? ;)
    I hope one day @servo@floss.social or @ladybirdbrowser@bird.makeup outruns badly managed Firefox.

    • cybergazer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Mozilla has been a sinking ship for years now. Their mission statement mentions themselves as an AI company rather than a browser company and they slowly keep rolling out more ads and telemetry each release.

      For now Librewolf and Thorium are better alternatives. I hope the ladybird browser takes off though since its the only real competition for Blink/WebKit engine

  • vivahyar@social.vivaldi.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    @jon@vivaldi.net Mozilla plays important role and I hope they’ll keep on with their mission, however I still don’t understand what happens with tens of millions in revenue for the foundation and hundreds of millions for the corporation.

  • JoeBecomeTheSun@social.vivaldi.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    @jon@vivaldi.net If only Mozilla spent their billion dollars in assets actually developing Firefox and Thunderbird instead of AI and political advocacy. In the field of politics, persuing technological advancement first can do a lot more than asking permission later.

  • SynopsisTantilize
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    How long until I have to switch to Netscape Navigator for a chromium alternative?