• P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    they intentionally waited until the “primary” was over so that Biden could get the incumbent automatic primary votes and then let him drop out so they could rush in Kamala without having a real primary.

    If that was the case, they would have done it sooner. Kamala stepping in was definitely an unplanned, and unprecedented, move. It’s a huge risk to drop the incumbent in favor of somebody else.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 minutes ago

      i think it was perfectly timed

      a) after the primary was informally settled

      b) a couple weeks before the candidate was formally sworn in

      If that was the case, they would have done it sooner

      sooner and there may have been a real primary contest. too risky. they did it with just enough time to sort of “zerg rush” Kamala into the primary without giving anyone time to mount a meaningful attempt at the primary

      and unprecedented, move. It’s a huge risk to drop the incumbent in favor of somebody else.

      unprecedented, yes. it’s the first time in US history since we’ve been using the primary system that a candidate got the party nomination without a single vote being cast for them

      risky, also yes. but they (I think correctly) determined that Biden was a lost cause.

      so it was either a) go with the guy you know you’re gonna lose or b) go with someone you will probably lose with

      b is the logical choice