• rotten
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is why you lost. The entire media complex bombards me with your messages every day. On all platforms, through most institutions. I can’t throw a rock without hitting an opposing view, one opposing view.

    If I disagree or question that view, I get banned. I’m not even the least bit conservative and I’ve had enough of it. Entertainment that “isn’t for me”, news that drowns out the real issues on trump with bleating about him being a rapist felon nazi… the list goes on and on. It’s one huge firehose of propaganda and I’ve simply tuned out.

    You own the psyop machine and then cry about how everyone else isn’t living in “reality”. I had thought this would have been a wake up call for self-absorbed leftists but it’s looking more and more like you are going to keep doubling down. You talk about a “cult” and yet many say the same thing about you. No republicans killed themselves over trump losing.

    • Ruxias@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      In your mind what is a “real” issue about Trump that hasn’t been covered? I’m curious what criticism you think has been lost here. The man has had almost every detail of himself, his circle, and his platform dissected constantly for the last forever it seems like.

      • rotten
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Literally what worked and what didn’t. Everything is tainted with putler orange man bad. His coverage is 98% negative. The people dissecting him have an axe to grind and are hard to take seriously.

          • rotten
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is an answer. The legitimate things trump does wrong are drowned in the sea of biased reporting. Even now with the tariff talk. These false stories of companies skipping christmas bonuses and crying wolf. What happens when they really do put a tariff on something they shouldn’t. That’s going to be a blip and not be remembered. What if it does spur domestic manufacturing of something, won’t be covered either. You end up in a situation where people just tune in or tune out based on their bias and end up completely uninformed at both ends.

            • chakan2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              These false stories of companies skipping christmas bonuses and crying wolf.

              Uh…those aren’t false. They’ve been cross checked with AP. Also, look at the trends from his first presidency and they follow. It’s not a surprise, at all.

              What if it does spur domestic manufacturing of something

              Because no one will notice when all those jobs are minimum wage, no protections, shit jobs. For example…the reason there’s so many Tech layoffs right now isn’t the economy. It’s because they figured out they can fire an FTE and rehire them on contract for 20-50k cheaper due to no benefits. Trump exempted them from overtime. He’s going to do that to factory workers as well.

              And you can’t manufacture anything if you don’t have the materials to build. Check out what happened in Michigan with Foxconn.

              Trump bankrupted a casino…it’s a business model where people walk in and hand you money. It’s damn near impossible to lose money in that model. But he did it somehow.

            • Ruxias@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I asked what you thought a legitimate criticism (that wasn’t presented enough by media) was of Trump and you essentially just hand waved. If this is such a problem in your eyes surely you wouldn’t need to use Google or soul-seek to find an example.

              Do you think him being convicted of sexual abuse was just “noise” that drowned out the actual problems? Is that something not worth informing voters about? I’m confused where you’re trying to draw the line here. Is the character of a candidate not to be scrutinized? Shouldn’t we try to be sure that a candidate will do the right thing even when it isn’t reported on?

    • Saryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      We all lost, dumbass. You’re not messaging us from another planet, are ya?

      PS: Except for maybe Musk, etc. Or maybe they just don’t know it yet.

      • rotten
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        There you go assuming everyone is a progressive again. Reality has a “liberal” bias when you surround yourself in an echo chamber.

        • chakan2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Reality has a “liberal” bias when you surround yourself in an echo chamber.

          Humans are herd animals. The need to keep the herd going is a instinctual thing. The conservative view is very much self centered. It goes against our nature as a species.

          • rotten
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Then we are certainly wired differently. I have no need to keep the “herd” going or to do what others demand beyond the practical. There is probably a collectivist vs individualist argument here too and the voluntary and involuntary aspects of cooperation herein.