• jake_eric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s okay. I think it could have been named better.

    I understand their reasoning for not having a downside as part of the main mechanic, but at the least I would have expected more cards to add a downside. Like some powerful mythic with a really strong effect whenever the Ring tempts you, but when it temps you for the Xth time you lose the game, something like that.

  • KaaliaNovokh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I plan on making the Lord of the Nazgul with a side of the Ring tempting my Wraiths. I think it will be a fun deck to play.

  • haganbmj@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a fan of it being all upside. At a glance it doesn’t seem as annoying as Initiative, but that’s a low bar.

  • JakeBacon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The mechanic is very nice flavor-wise and fine as a mechanic but it doesn’t scratch any of my MTG itches. I’m a fan of combos and engines, and the mechanic does not lend itself well to that play style.

  • SlingerOGrady@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the way it works is fine I just wish that when you were tempted you didn’t have to pick a different creature every time to become a ringbearer, moving the ring around is kind of a pain. You should be able to pay mana or pay 1-2 life to keep that creature as your ring bearer.

    • Chemslayer@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good news: you don’t have to! Changing the creature is optional. It says so on the ring card, “choose a creature to become or remain the ring-bearer”