Justice Janet Protasiewicz was sworn in as the newest member of the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Aug. 1, following an impressive victory over far-right former Justice Dan Kelly earlier this year that gave the court a progressive majority for the first...
  • Mateoto@lemmy.worldEnglish
    441·
    10 months ago

    It’s truly surprising how a small minority once held such significant sway over public life, using their influence to gain advantages that seemed almost unchecked. Reflecting on the conservative court in Wisconsin, it’s astonishing that for years, some could accept or overlook their practices like gerrymandering and questionable rulings.

    But now, there’s a fresh breeze of change. With a shift in the court’s composition, it’s heartening to witness ethics taking center stage, especially after a period of conservative dominance. The fact that this court’s legitimacy is anchored in democratic processes and its direction leans towards progressivism signals a positive step towards a more just and balanced future.

    It reminds us that even seemingly entrenched power dynamics can evolve, and that the pursuit of ethical governance is paramount.

    • Pattern@lemmy.worldEnglish
      51·
      10 months ago

      This is all true. I think it’s also important to note that the court’s shift is a result of strong state-level organizing by the WI Democratic Party. Voter mood has shifted since the Tea Party years, yes, but our Democratic Party has also done really well in getting out the vote, particularly in college towns.

      What’s happening in Wisconsin is my rejoinder to apathetic or nihilistic voters. Organizing matters and voting matters. There is a real difference between the two main parties and tangible benefits happen when you elect Democrats.

  • Tester
    292·
    10 months ago

    Rules for thee but not for me…

    • JesseoftheNorth@kbin.social
      41·
      10 months ago

      “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds, but does not protect.” - Frank Wilhoit