• rus@layer8.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @GBU_28 skip any example that doesn’t routinely involve the single biggest cause of child death in the US. There is no reason for a person to be exceeding the speed limit by double. That’s just gambling with others life and limb.

    I think a multi-thousand dollar, income adjusted fine should be the minimum in that case.

    • GBU_28
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The point is I selected an example that had no relation to cars or driving, and no safety context.

      The point of the example was ownership, and dealings with the government.

      Critical thinking 101

      I made clear in earlier comments that I’m aware driving is a privilege and reckless driving is a serious crime

      • rus@layer8.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @GBU_28 the point is significance of the criminal action and the penalty.

        Paying my property taxes late should have a fine (a penalty), but assuming I pay them with in a reasonable time, one that is not significant (say 2% of the taxes amount, or a flat fee of $25)

        The government is taking things of value without recompense because I failed to act with in the law.

        I’ve seen no argument from you that the penalty is not reasonable, or that a reasonable penalty is unjust.

        • rus@layer8.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @GBU_28 additionally, there are many cases where the government seizes the tools used to commit the crime.

          I (off the top of my head) only find issue with this where the confiscated “stuff” is not evidence and taken prior to conviction.