Comcast blasted for seeking “loopholes” in rule requiring disclosure of all fees.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah I’m super grateful for it. Before I was living at my current place, I lived at an apartment, and we could only get Comcast cable. The apartment building had an agreement with Comcast that ensured they were the only available internet provider.

    Leave it to Comcast to make FTTP suck.

    Wow, that’s bad. I didn’t know they did that.

    Comcast have a legit fiber network where I live (San Francisco Bay Area). It’s not even GPON or XGS-PON or anything like that where multiple houses share bandwidth; with Comcast’s version you get a dedicated fiber run from your house all the way to the headend, no multiplexing.

    You do pay a premium for it though. It was originally 2Gbps symmetric for $300/month, now it’s 6Gbps for the same price (with 10Gbps coming soon).

    • frostycakes@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even worse is that RFoG is compatible with the various PON standards (it’s just the entirety of the coax cable plant, just mirrored over light), so there’s zero reason why FTTP locations can’t have standard fiber configurations and it be shared with the copper plant backbone that was the original reason for RFoG.

      Comcast (and the rest of their cableco pals at Charter, Cox, et al, with the exception of Altice) are bascially addicted to copper. My parents had a new house built last year in a greenfield community, and, you guessed it, Comcast ran coax to the houses instead of FTTP like CenturyLink did. I do not understand why brand new copper plant is being buried and installed in 2023, it’s obscene.