wrong. fivethirtyeight found that perot cost clinton a wider margin of victory.
A 1999 study in the American Journal of Political Science estimated that Perot’s candidacy hurt the Clinton campaign, reducing “Clinton’s margin of victory over Bush by seven percentage point.”[47] In 2016, FiveThirtyEight noted that it was “unlikely” that Perot was a spoiler.[48]
The spoiler effect was very evident when Ross Perot ran during the 1992 presidential election which put Clinton in office.
Well yes, that and the epic sax skills effect haha.
wrong. fivethirtyeight found that perot cost clinton a wider margin of victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_United_States_presidential_election#Analysis