• ganksy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The burden is on you to provide proof that can hold up through scientific rigor. Asking scientists to prove something does not exist is religion.

    • SignullGone@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with that statement. However, I don’t think that was the point Avi was making.

      • ganksy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Avi is saying NDT should go get the evidence. That’s not the job of peer review. I’m not championing Tyson nor am I demonizing him for being sceptical.

        • SignullGone@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          My apologies; he did mention that. He later said, “You just sit back and relax. Let the science be done the way it should be done.” This is fresher in my mind. I interpreted that to mean, stop being so dismissive and simply wait for us to produce our peer-reviewed papers.