fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoThe difference of stealing yourself vs being stolen fromimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1316arrow-down132file-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up1284arrow-down1imageThe difference of stealing yourself vs being stolen fromfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square97fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-squaresnooggums@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoPatents are about implementation, not concepts.
minus-square520@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoexactly! That tablet you saw in Star Trek TNG is not an implementation, as it’s not a real device.
minus-squaresnooggums@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoBut is is a concept, which was what you appeared to be disagreeing with.
minus-square520@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-210 months agoIt is a concept indeed. When I said that, I merely provided commentary on how Apple was behaving, not what reflected reality. Apple weaponised their patents because they, or rather, Steve, believed they owned the concept.
Patents are about implementation, not concepts.
exactly! That tablet you saw in Star Trek TNG is not an implementation, as it’s not a real device.
But is is a concept, which was what you appeared to be disagreeing with.
It is a concept indeed. When I said that, I merely provided commentary on how Apple was behaving, not what reflected reality. Apple weaponised their patents because they, or rather, Steve, believed they owned the concept.