Elections are barred under Ukraine’s martial law but its next expiration is before the March 2024 presidential vote

Peacetime elections in Ukraine cost around 135 million euros and Zelensky wants Western election observers on the frontlines

https://www.rte.ie/news/ukraine/2023/0827/1401976-ukraine-elections/

Other sources: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/zelenskiy-says-elections-could-happen-under-fire-if-west-helps-2023-08-27/

https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-08-28-23/h_fcd630057aa99d72fdad00c3c21990b6

  • novibe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes except there are no Bolsheviks left in Russia… while this whole situation is a tragedy, Russia is not anything we should ever support.

    Putin and the current oligarchy are conservative capitalists. They are the furthest thing possible from the former USSR.

    • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You should tell that to Victoria Nuland then. The way these people see it, there’s no difference. They hate what they call “Russia”, no matter who rules it or what name it has.

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I know, and it’s absurd.

        I am 100% against NATO and the Anglo Empire, but I can’t support Putin either.

        But people can’t see it as possible to be against Nazi Ukraine joining NATO and also against Putin as a whole.

        To hope the Empire crumbles and that the people of Russia are free from a fascist oligarchy.

        Both positions are possible! They are not opposite.

        No socialist would ever be against NATO and pro-Putin.

        But if you try to look at things objectively and don’t cheer for death you’re a Putin supporter…

        • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          I critically support Russia in this war. Materially, it’s the best option right now to dismantle the US hegemony and open the road for socialist revolution.

          • novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            But Russia can’t win… at least not against the US. Not unless something crazy like China joined in.

            But I feel this is exactly what the US wants. It wants to keep Ukraine just barely strong enough to not outright lose, and for Russia to keep losing people. And the war machine in Western Europe and the US will get richer and richer. Another Iraq, a decades long conflict.

            I don’t support Ukraine winning, cause that would likely be the end of Russia and as Ukraine currently shows an extinction of all the left in Europe pretty much.

            But I really doubt Putin and the current Russian government have any socialist or leftist goals. That they would ever be possible allies if there wasn’t a common GIGANTIC enemy.

            And I also believe that’s on purpose. The current state of affairs in Russia is a consequence of basically the CIA destroying the USSR and trying to shape the future of Russia.

            All in all, I’m not very hopeful to be honest. I want to believe there is socialism out there. That the other side of the coin is right. But I always have this fear we’re being double played and it’s all the Empire y’know? It’s all theatre. Nothing is real anymore.

            • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I know what you mean, but we have to assess the world in a historical materialist way and not in an idealist way.

              NATO is losing credibility and is fraying. The petrodollar is collapsing. US/UK/European hegemony is retreating. That’s what matters here for me. A stronger Russia, whether it is capitalist or socialist, is a good thing, because multipolarity makes the US less inclined to mess up other countries. The uprisings in Africa against neocolonialism at this point in time are not accidental or coincidental. They very much have to do with the US having its eyes elsewhere.

    • KiG V2@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Russia’s second biggest party is their communist party. Calcified remains of the Union exist to this day in the for of state owned assets and industries as well as a potent social safety and wellbeing net. Their continued friendship with China, even if just a pragmatic alliance against Western hegemony for now, ensures a steady exposure to and normalization of socialist values. The leftward potential of Russia is potent–they have only been “not socialist” for 30 years and the rampant liberalization of the 90s has slowed. Precedent is a powerful force multiplier. The younger generation of Russians are more hipster and Western and liberal in their spirit which will take a toll on future socialist endeavors but the final tally is that Russia is much more likely to be socialist much faster than most major countries across the planet.

      Even if there was no internal potential for reestablishing the USSR–which there is–the fact remains that pragmatically we absolutely should support Russia. They provide weapons, training, soldiers, and a major trade partner to socialist, anti-imperialist, and imperialized countries craving independence all over Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and beyond. They singlehandedly have been a major thorn in the side of the United States Empire and their denial of imperial targets has triggered the Empire’s final decline. In the war in Ukraine, they singlehandedly drained decades worth of weapons, vehicles, money, and fascist soldiers from the entire NATO coalition’s stockpile. As a result this has emboldened vulnerable countries even more; there will be many more Nigers over the next few years, and because they smugly underestimated Russia and lost everything due to their hubris. Russia has taken the brunt of punishment from the U.S. so that the rest of the world may be a step closer to peace and prosperity, and so that ultimately global socialism will be actualized.

      We can criticize Putin and his “oligarchs” (why are only Russian capitalists called “oligarchs” when by sheer circumstance they are not as gaudy nor powerful as their Western counterparts?) for their past of looting the country or the present push against LGBT (unfortunately causing the influx of young Westernized hipsters as a reactive force), but we absolutely can not tolerate such statements as “Russia is not something we should EVER support.” People in the most poor and imperialized countries across the world wave Russian flags even more than they wave Chinese ones! It is for good reason, many good reasons. Humanity, particularly the poor and those interested in a socialist future, owe them everything.

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would say every capitalist country has oligarchs lol Elon, Jeff Bezos, Gates… all oligarchs. But whatever.

        I can only say I hope you’re right. I’m more skeptical tbh. I feel us the “little people” are the only ones actually fighting for “good”. And we’ve been losing for thousands of years.