Emotion recognition systems are finding growing use, from monitoring customer responses to ads to scanning for ‘distressed’ women in danger.

  • Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can to an extent, but that’s a losing venture. If pubic opinion goes against this tech hard enough, it’ll keep some people from working in those industries. BUT if those products are profitable enough, they will simply pay more and that’ll be moot.

    Attacking the people who are earning a living isn’t the answer. Most people take the job with the best combo of pay and work/life balance they can find in their area, or if they can afford to move. Not that many have the luxury to pick and choose based on their morality. And if compensation is high enough, it’s a lot less likely.

    It’s far easier to try to prevent this tech from being used at all. I know political action is hard as hell but it’s a lot easier than trying to ostracize an entire industry’s worth of workers. It may feel easier to denigrate faceless individuals but that won’t accomplish anything. Plenty of people work for weapons manufacturers and such.

    • kool_newt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Plenty of people work for weapons manufacturers and such.

      And those are bad people. If you work to build technology used to maintain power when you have an option not to, what else can that be called? These people are not desperate for a job.

      I’m an engineer, I quit \ (after the startup I worked for was acquired) because Intel powers much of the MI complex. I quit \ when it became clear I was directly assisting with state level genetic experiments. As an engineer I could easily get a job elsewhere where I was not directly contributing to the downfall of my fellow humans.

      Take McDonald’s for example. There’s a difference between someone who needs a job working in a restaurant and an Engineer working for McDonald’s figuring out how to more efficiently slaughter animals paid only to be concerned about their employer’s profit – that engineer could go work to more efficiently bake cookies.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        These people are not desperate for a job.

        You’re painting with a firehose. Some people are.

        I’m an engineer, I quit Intel (after the startup I worked for was acquired) because Intel powers much of the MI complex. I quit Illumina when it became clear I was directly assisting with state level genetic experiments. As an engineer I could easily get a job elsewhere where I was not directly contributing to the downfall of my fellow humans.

        You are what we call, privileged. Maybe you should…check it?

        • PiecePractical@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I was a field service tech at a machine tool distributor for 15 years. One day about 7 years ago I realized that more of our customers than not were involved in some kind of arms manufacturing. Everything from components to military armaments to places making parts for AR-15s. Didn’t start that way but the business drifted into that market over time.

          I decided to move on and it took me all of 5 years to find a position that; a) I was qualified for, b) paid enough that I wouldn’t lose my house and, c) was relatively safe from drifting into the customer base as the last company.

          I don’t even have kids and this whole process was absolutely terrifying. I can easily see how someone with a family to support or less stability in their life wouldn’t feel like leaving was a possibility.