Idk, I like the original version much more. This one seems borderline nonsensical—the only vaguely recognizable ones are squirtle and pikachu. The value in the original was that it had a plausible and scientific explanation for their anatomy…this one is just cobbled together realistic “Pokémon” with nonsense text for no reason. Just my 2¢
The original is called Pokénatomy and was illustrated and created by Christopher Stoll. I believe it started as some drawings on his deviant art and then he made a Kickstarter to turn it into an actual textbook. Here’s a link that explains about it (idk how to embed links here, sorry):
Idk, I like the original version much more. This one seems borderline nonsensical—the only vaguely recognizable ones are squirtle and pikachu. The value in the original was that it had a plausible and scientific explanation for their anatomy…this one is just cobbled together realistic “Pokémon” with nonsense text for no reason. Just my 2¢
Impressive prompt work, though.
Definitely no logic in the anatomy, but I find it interesting what the Ai comes up with
Whats the original?
The original is called Pokénatomy and was illustrated and created by Christopher Stoll. I believe it started as some drawings on his deviant art and then he made a Kickstarter to turn it into an actual textbook. Here’s a link that explains about it (idk how to embed links here, sorry):
https://www.awesomeinventions.com/pokemon-anatomy-book-pokenatomy/