s804@kbin.social to Programming@kbin.social · 1 year agoAI and Coding.message-squaremessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up134arrow-down1message-squareAI and Coding.s804@kbin.social to Programming@kbin.social · 1 year agomessage-square51fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLollerCorleone@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down11·1 year agoIts good for basic Python scripts and stuff, but not so good for complex programs.
minus-square___hulk@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoLike any other tool, it’s as good as you use it. If you can explain complex problems in smaller bites with clear objectives it helps a lot.
minus-squarebored_pistachio@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoYes, but no. You can be as precise as you want, if ChatGPT didn’t have enough training material you won’t get good answer even if you bend over backwards. I can’t complain 95% of time, however prompt is not to blame all the time.
Its good for basic Python scripts and stuff, but not so good for complex programs.
Like any other tool, it’s as good as you use it. If you can explain complex problems in smaller bites with clear objectives it helps a lot.
Yes, but no.
You can be as precise as you want, if ChatGPT didn’t have enough training material you won’t get good answer even if you bend over backwards.
I can’t complain 95% of time, however prompt is not to blame all the time.