Poor Data… (⁠ᗒ⁠ᗩ⁠ᗕ⁠)

  • irmoz@reddthat.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The actual scene

    And I would just like to say: yes, if you are offended, your feelings are valid. Whether people respect them or not is a different story. You’re not entitled to respect for your feelings, but on the other hand, you’re also not entitled to be a dick about people’s feelings and claim you’re just being rational and logical.

    When you mock people for being offended and emotional, you are also being emotional: you’re feeling very, very smug.

    I also find it rather… interesting… that this comic reframes Dr Pulaski as the offended party, rather than Data, as it was in the original. I do sure wonder if there’s anything about Dr Pulaski that a certain segment of the population would identify as emotional and irrational.

    • vivadanang
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      well put on all points. Was trying to recall when Pulaski was anything but super-doc professional.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I also find it rather… interesting… that this comic reframes Dr Pulaski as the offended party, rather than Data, as it was in the original. I do sure wonder if there’s anything about Dr Pulaski that a certain segment of the population would identify as emotional and irrational.

      The other party in the discussion is a robot

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        He is an android with a positronic network, that has displayed on numerous occasions the capacity to feel. The linked video is one example.

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Do they need to? In the image, he just appears to be a human dressed weirdly.

            • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              If you don’t know any further context you’d think the other person is an unemotional robot, which works for the meme.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        staying calm and being rational doesn’t necessarily mean you’re being smug.

        I know.

        Flatly stating the facts is not smugness.

        I know! I specifically mentioned “mocking”.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    10 months ago

    In the actual scene they’re coming to an understanding about his name.

  • moog
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    owned snowflake big mad ooga booga offended woke libtard ooga booga

  • iHUNTcriminals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Hey I just got a 4 day ban from news at lemmyworld because I said the BT in LGBT meant Bluetooth. Did someone really get offended and think I thought that Bi Sexual and Trans people are actually computer hardware? It was such an obviously dumb joke that being so dumb was the joke.

  • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Seems like you lost an argument in the shower and are venting here about how “unconcerned” you are.

  • dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s a Facebook tier meme. Beyond this it is making up an adversary and belittling them, which is not really a sign of maturity.