• Sens@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The main complaint is that for people of colour, to be sat in a classroom with their peers whilst the derogatory words are read out loud is highly uncomfortable for them. I totally can understand that and why this is now coming up as more and more of the UK are becoming multicultural.

    It should be taught in a classroom yes, but probably not in English literature class and something more like a Modern History of British Culture class, where it can be explained why Of Mice and Men was originally selected for a GCSE book, why it’s no longer acceptable, why the derogatory words are disgraceful and then why it was removed from the syllabus. This gives an all round education on the subject. Not perfect but it’s a start.

    When I was in high school I was told half-caste was an acceptable term in the mid 2000s, and I still accidentally used it till a couple years ago because I was never told otherwise. It was only because of a friend who is more social than I am told me it’s no longer acceptable to use to refer to people with mixed racial parents.

    • /JJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can see why, only if it is still being taught as it was 30 years ago - ie without addressing the language used - and I hope thats not the case. I can’t imagine anyone doing so in 2023.

      If you start pulling stuff for those reasons (and for the record, I dont understand why they are still reading Steinbeck anyway) you go down a slightly dodgy path.

      • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of Mice and Men is a good novel for lower-attaining teens who struggle with reading. It’s very short (5 or so chapters), deals with “adult issues” and is a bit like a “novel-by-numbers” where you can introduce things like setting, theme, characters, symbolism in a pretty straightforward way. One of the problems was that when schools began chasing exam grades in earnest because of accountability, ALL kids started studying the novel including the top end who should be academically stretched by something more challenging.

    • /JJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      forgot to say -

      . When I was in high school I was told half-caste was an acceptable term in the mid 2000s,

      dual heritage is the way to go ! and much more meaningful.

    • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s possible to read the novel and see discriminatory language without speaking it aloud. It needs to be taught in a context where the racism (and misogyny and abuse of disabled as well) are called out. English lessons are the best place for this to happen.

      There’s a great poem that’s been taught in English classrooms for years by John Agard called “Half-Caste” where he demolishes the racism of the term.

      Teachers - English teachers - need to challenge and discuss racism.

      • Sens@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sounds like I had a crap English teacher then if being taught “half-caste” was meant to frame it as a racist term.

        • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Quite likely. There are a great number of poorly-educated terrible English teachers. Pot luck if you find a good one in a school.