To support decentralization and spread, should lemmy.world close registration at some point to prevent a performance overload due to too many users? Of course, if registration is disabled, there could be a hint placed somewhere near that from other instances you can interact with content on lemmy.world just like you had registered on it. There could be a link to join-lemmys instance overview.

  • Nine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends on server loads and scaling.

    If the engineer(s) and admin(s) running things can handle the costs associated with growth then I think it should stay open. However at a certain point the load on the infrastructure, sysadmins, and cost make that untenable.

    It’s not cheap to run this kind of stuff. I know that first hand because of my career running HPC clusters and running them in cloud environments.

    I’ve got a pretty solid idea of what this must be costing and I’m really thankful that someone is putting in the thankless labor of love. That’s why I canceled my Reddit premium and started donating to this instance to help with that in some way. The only other way I could help is donating my time & experience. But I think they need money more than engineers lol

    The TL;DR is that if we want to keep these things online we need to donate money (and/or time/labor).

    • illi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Funilly enough, apparently they have enough server power and the bottleneck is the software. Or so I was told.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even as a small instance operator, the media storage increases at a pretty steady rate. It’s probably going to be a case of months or even years before it starts getting to costing money I will notice. But, still I guess we can by then start to purge very old stuff if we’re not a big instance though.

    • Quexotic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the one of the best takes here. It’s a delicate balance. Performance, cost, and manageability. Fail in any of these, and it doesn’t matter, you’ll either lose access to the site or be unable to manage it.

      If staffing or money are insufficient, the site should do what’s necessary for survival, but only just before that threshold is exceeded. Users are important, but self destruction is not an option.