• lildictator@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We don’t have enough information. As long as she kept her work in school separated from her OnlyFans, I see nothing wrong with her having a second job.

    This sentence is ambiguous:

    Among them is allegedly posting material on public social media accounts that “involves the sexualization of the school environment.”

    Is this implying that she took any of her OnlyFans pictures while inside the school? That wouldn’t be okay. But if what it is referring to, as she alleges, is that she took pictures elsewhere while wearing a school uniform, then the only thing that matters in my mind is whether it was a generic school uniform or the specific uniform used at the school she worked at.

    We are generally very hypocritical in matters surrounding porn and sex work.

    • grte@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good analysis and I tend to agree. There are certainly lines she could cross, but based on the information given it doesn’t seem like she did. To those fearing children can be exposed to this, I say, we all know what OnlyFans is by now. There’s a lot of talk going on about letting parents parent, well, here’s your chance.

    • Established_Trial
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, and your comment is spot on to what i was thinking as i read the article