Most people in capitalist countries never leave the economic bracket they were born into. Capitalism is a primitive system of elites and peasants, filled with squalor and death.

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So what is your point, then?

    That primitive systems of elites and peasants, filled with squalor and death, is what humans in general create, not just capitalists.

    That abusing power and killing people is human?

    That wasn’t my original point but that is certainly true.

    • ThePenitentOne@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just false though. You are ignoring how heavily the environment you live in impacts you. It’s literally everything. Living in a hierarchic society that oppresses those below and provides massive benefits for those above just incentivises people to express greedy behaviours because otherwise they will be stuck below to suffer. If you changed the environment one lived in and was educated in, you could create a completely different outcome. It’s no surprise abusive families tend to be cyclical, while it is incredibly rare somebody becomes abusive on their own. Behaviours are learned for the most part.

      Also, the whole ‘humans in general’ is just dishonest. The people making the decisions are a minority within a minority. It’s not representative of the larger population. You can say the people participating are supporting it, which is true, but even then it doesn’t mean that they would want the system to be that way in the first place. For many poorer people without opportunities, they have no choice or chance to advance. It’s literally rigged against them.

      Abusing power and killing people are acts that humans do. But so is everything, so that isn’t really even a point. Literally everything is we do is ‘human’.

      If you want to say ‘humans in general’ create these systems, then why do you think that is anyway?

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just false though.

        I disagree.

        If you want to say ‘humans in general’ create these systems, then why do you think that is anyway?

        Because lying and cheating increases one’s chances of survival. Hence humans lie, cheat and steal and the most “successful” people (read: richest and most powerful) are those who lie, cheat and steal the best.

        This is from contemporary philosopher Martin Butler, informed by Spinoza and Schopenhauer:

        https://martinbutler.eu/

        Hell is Other People

        Power Games

        Martin Butler - Corporeal Fantasy 115 (Business managers and intelligence)

        Martin Butler - Corporeal Fantasy 001 (Success)

        • ThePenitentOne@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But it doesn’t even to serve to increase the chance of survival past a point. It becomes redundant and if anything makes you a bigger target once you get so high. Eventually, it just becomes needless greed at the expense of others and requires a lack of morals and apathy to continue on. I think the real problem is that people don’t hold others accountable, and because narcissistic and psychopathic people tend to search for power, they are usually the ones ending up in the roles. The issue is that society doesn’t care that it is that way, and that people have used their influence to conditions others into thinking that the system they live in is OK and not completely unjust. So yes, when people are not held accountable, the worst people climb to the top the fastest. Yet, humans have also proven that they can overcome their own instincts and also through their own work managed to make it so that modern day survival is incredibly easily for almost everyone when they didn’t need to. Humans are not bound to act a certain way due to their genetics. It’s usually a reaction to the system they live in and what they are told that causes their behaviours, of course certain people will always end up a certain way, but that is very rare.

          • rah@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            But it doesn’t even to serve to increase the chance of survival past a point.

            The driver is not just survival of the individual but survival of their genes. That is, procreation. And there’s no point in the acquisition of power at which more power stops being sexually attractive.