Yeah I want to see option three where whatever imaginary number of people exactly comfortably fits into either 100 fully detached homes OR 100 apartments in a single block (realistically I don’t think there is a number of people both those things serve equally) intergrate into the natural environment of their new island home in a mutually beneficial way. The fundamental claim of this post is “we cannot coexist with nature. The only viable way for us to provide housing for humans is in a way that is in direct competition with the wellbeing of their environment” is foolish and the root of the issues it claims to be trying to solve.
![[meme] How would you rather see this land developed?](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/f6ec67a5-2636-4875-8dd4-fa5241a3083c.jpeg){kind=link}
Yeah I want to see option three where whatever imaginary number of people exactly comfortably fits into either 100 fully detached homes OR 100 apartments in a single block (realistically I don’t think there is a number of people both those things serve equally) intergrate into the natural environment of their new island home in a mutually beneficial way. The fundamental claim of this post is “we cannot coexist with nature. The only viable way for us to provide housing for humans is in a way that is in direct competition with the wellbeing of their environment” is foolish and the root of the issues it claims to be trying to solve.