Archived page

    Detective Tom Murphy spoke during the council’s public comment period, a week after Sheline and Councilor Linda Scott announced the formation of the committee on the heels of two public forums on the topic.    
    Murphy said “certain politicians” are trying to “pit the community against the Police Department,” and are “spinning a tragic situation into a political game for their reelections.”    
    “We are not your enemy,” he said. “We only care about the well-being of this city and its safety.”

  • RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    10 months ago

    Then you shouldn’t worry about being monitored.

    I’m not the enemy, but my speed is checked by radar, my license plate read by automatic scanners cameras on police cars, my internet activity monitored for DMCA violations, etc.

    Join the rest of us, you don’t deserve to be an exception.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 months ago

    Murphy said “certain politicians” are trying to “pit the community against the Police Department,” and are “spinning a tragic situation into a political game for their reelections.”

    “We are not your enemy,” he said. “We only care about the well-being of this city and its safety.”

    Funny how listening to constituents is a “political game,” and making sure our civic employees aren’t murdering people or destroying lives makes us “enemies.”

    The message comes through the static after all.

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    “we only care about the well being of this city and it’s safety, now leave us alone, and we don’t want you bastards looking over our shoulder all the time regardless of how often we prove this not to be the case”

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      You forgot Qualified Immunity! These people are literally immune to prosecution of crimes they decided to commit while working…

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        You forgot Qualified Immunity! These people are literally immune to prosecution of crimes they decided to commit while working…

        I am anti QI, and as far as my views on police I think my profile makes it clear, but to be fair it protects against civil cases, not criminal.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    When we demanded cops wear body cameras, police union said it would be a technical challenge.

    But then police video came out and all the bs they do was brought to the public.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Anybody else curious about his tattoos?

      I am guessing a swastikas might be hidden under that shirt.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    I thought you shouldn’t be afraid if you have nothing to hide?

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    As he sat there smashing the Xbox me and my siblings got for Christmas with a big hammer, my dad said the same thing:

    I am not your enemy. I only care about your well-being and I’m doing this to help you.

    These people are criminal psychopaths and don’t deserve any civility or freedom in public life.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s so childish and transparent. If there’s nothing untoward happening, then this should not be an issue.

    The trouble is police seem to like to think about it as some kind of weird privacy issue, and somehow getting in the way if functioning. It is not. Police are public servants who oftentimes have forgotten their role as such. If they can’t function as a public service with public oversight, they should find a different line of work more suited to them.

  • Nusm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    They should just comply.

  • deadtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    "We only care about the well-being of [property in] this city and its safety [for those with wealth, influence and/or the right shade of skin].”

    Corrected it.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      At least when it’s in response to oversight. When the task is not being an enemy, it should be real easy to say, “we are not your enemy” and then accept the oversight with open arms. It’s extra help towards the same goal, right? Oversight should be welcome.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah if they weren’t the enemy and were facing accusations like they are on the job they’d welcome it. Like I hate being surveilled too, even at work. But when someone might get hurt I want my actions and everything visible and if people were arguing differently about events I’d welcome cameras involved.

        Hell, these are people saying they’re running up against criminals in the act all the time, who want to prove that these people are committing crimes in front of them, and they’re saying that they don’t want cameras to show their perspective on the job.

  • kgbbot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Bullshit you are not only our enemy your enabling police to hurt us. Fuck you.