New data from the Guttmacher Institute indicate that U.S. abortions have increased after the fall of Roe v. Wade, not decreased.

While the reproductive health policy group estimated that around 465,000 abortions occurred during the first six months of 2020, they estimated that about 511,000 occurred during the same period in 2023. The group’s data only include legal abortions.

The change seems counterintuitive, especially considering that 15 states have outright banned abortion (though Indiana’s ban was not in effect during the period studied) in the 14 months since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. However, there are a few possible explanations for the unexpected uptick in abortions.

According to The Washington Post, in the year following the Supreme Court’s decision overturning the national right to an abortion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 16 new abortion clinics opened in states where the procedure remained legal. Not only did this help pro-choice states bordering pro-life states absorb traveling patients, but it likely also allowed for additional abortions—such as those from women who live in a state where abortion is legal but had previously lived too far away from an abortion clinic to travel for the procedure.

Access to medication abortion—abortions that are performed in early pregnancy, typically by a woman taking a prescribed medication at home or in a doctor’s office—also expanded following the fall of Roe. Following the Food and Drug Administration’s 2021 decision to permanently allow abortion medication to be prescribed via telemedicine, it became much easier for women—especially those living far away from an abortion clinic or doctor’s office—to obtain abortion medications.

COVID restrictions were likely not a factor in the increase between 2020 and 2023, as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recorded roughly the same number of procedures during 2020 and 2019. (The Guttmacher Institute does not have 2019 data).

While the Guttmacher Institute did not provide 2023 estimates for 14 states that had banned the procedure, abortions unsurprisingly declined in states where it was banned or restricted. And not all women who would have obtained an abortion before Dobbs ended up traveling elsewhere. According to a recent study from Johns Hopkins researchers, Texas’ six-week “heartbeat” ban resulted in nearly 10,000 more live births in the state over an eight-month period.

Notably, the Guttmacher Institute’s data also estimates far more abortions than those calculated by the CDC’s abortion surveillance studies, which recorded just 620,327 abortions during all of 2020. The Guttmacher Institute estimated 930,160, around 50 percent more. However, the CDC’s data doesn’t include California, Maryland, and New Hampshire, which—according to Guttmacher Institute data—performed almost 187,000 abortions in 2020, which would account for around 60 percent of the gap in estimated abortions.

The rest of the difference is likely due to the data-gathering method. While the Guttmacher Institute individually contacts all facilities known to have provided abortions to ask for their number of procedures, the CDC aggregates state-level data.

For pro-life advocates, this new data indicates an uncomfortable truth about post-Roe America. While access to abortion has plummeted in some states, it’s also gotten much easier to obtain one in others, primarily as a direct reaction to state-level bans. This trend seems to have effectively canceled out the impact of recent statewide abortion bans, showing that, as long as abortion remains legal in a significant part of the county, it will be incredibly difficult to prevent women from obtaining one.

  • snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was already known that access to abortions lower the rate because people had time to think through their decisions.

    When you put an unreasonable time limit they will decide faster within the time limit. If you remove access locally, people will be more decisive and follow through because of the effort needed to follow through.

  • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    For pro-life advocates, this new data indicates an uncomfortable truth about post-Roe America. While access to abortion has plummeted in some states, it’s also gotten much easier to obtain one in others, primarily as a direct reaction to state-level bans.

    Waiting for the pro-lifers to shed croc tears over their collective failure to control women’s bodies.

  • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Safe, medical abortions may have increased.

    We don’t know anything about unsafe, clandestine abortions.

    Anyway, like everything, this disproportionately affects the poor. I’m mostly too old for this to affect me, but I can just write a check if necessary.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much guaranteed that the unsafe clandestine abortions have increased more than the safe medical ones.

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We don’t know anything about unsafe, clandestine abortions.

      The other clandestine thing we probably will learn about in the next couple of years could be an increase in abandoned children.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Red wave? It could set the party back for an entire generation or two. I’d laugh if this weren’t such an important right.

      Savor this victory, fascists, it’s a big one, but it’ll have to sustain you for a long while.

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Getting rid of Roe v Wade wasn’t to decrease the number of abortions like people like to pretend, it was simply to return power to the states where it belongs. If all the states want to legalise abortion then go for it, that’s what the ruling was to allow.