I’m probably going to get hate for this but please watch the video till the end and make your judgement accordingly before making any reactionary comments.
Yeah honestly fuck off, you people are all about personal rights until it’s something you don’t personally approve of
Sigh. Reactionary as usual. You people claim to be open-minded but can’t think holistically how this will affect children and society as a whole.
someone named ‘TraditionalMuslim’ peddling anti-LGBT bullshit accuses others of being reactionary
lol. lmao, even.
They’re almost certainly fash posing as Muslim.
If you can actually look at the arguments presented instead of judging based on someone’s beliefs, you might learn a thing or two.
There are no arguments to be made because lgbt people just want to be accepted. the only harm to children is the abuse from the anti LGBT assholes. Stop trying to control people, that’s the whole agenda.
If that is how blind and one-sided you are living in your echo chamber. Then there’s nothing I can do about that except hope you are guided to the truth or face the consequences you will see in the next 10 or 20 years how much more worse the situation has gotten with this LGBT agenda.
The “LGBT agenda” is to be left alone. Stop sticking your nose in other people’s sex lives, genitals, etc. The sickening and depraved “Muslim Agenda” can go double suck Jesus and Mohamed’s cock with the equally disgusting Christians. Block this idiot and move on.
Real mature for mocking religious figures. If you don’t have the decency to respect other groups, this just shows your hypocracy for defending the LGBT group. I thought leftists were supposed to defend minorities?
Go ahead, present your arguments.
Take a look at the paper I just presented: https://sci-hub.st/10.2466/pr0.96.1.227-230. Proven by Illinois Department of Children & Family Services that homosexual parents are significantly more likely to abuse children.
That claim has been thoroughly debunked, and neither Paul Cameron nor the Family Research Institute is not a credible source.
That is a junk paper.
Citing a blog as a source. This is where you get your credible research from?
For others who are looking at this thread, the paper breaks down abuses by mother and father. The first cut is that 34% of the abuses were homosexual. So reasoning in generalities to support anti-LGBTQ+ causes is a misrepresentation right away. This is typical “scientifically backed” misinformation where the facts are twisted.
I’m not going to engage with the troll, but wanted to put something next to that link.
Correlation does not imply causation
Stop feeding the troll. Block him. Move on. He’s here because he wants your negative reactions. He’s a loser and this is the only way he knows how to get himself human interaction. You’re encouraging him.
So are you saying gay parents have some other problem that is causing this?
Oh hello rage baiter, lol. See ya 👋
You’re such a painfully obvious troll. Fuck off back to the fash sites you belong on.
Saying “don’t react to this incendiary post!” is just telling us you’re trolling or just trying to shove your fake morals derived from ancient mythologies down our throats. Naw, we will always resist you.
I ain’t trolling. Knew I was going to get reactionary hate but was looking for some honest discussion. I guess I expected too much from this echo chamber.
There is no such thing as honest discussion with religious zealots. It’s impossible to talk facts with people that believe in fairy tales, demons, heaven, satan, etc. Two completely different realities.
fuck off bigot.
“How did we have a drop of 7% in people thinking gay marriage is morally acceptable? I don’t know.”
Easy answer, right wing groups have been lying about the LGBT+ community. It’s that simple.
He also goes on to HEAVILY imply that gay parents that adopt kids abuse them - which is just factually incorrect.
This guy is the “just asking questions” type of person, but his questions are stupid and easy to answer - and also don’t end up supporting his point in the end. You take less than a minute to think about what he’s saying and you’ll realize he’s just kinda wrong on everything and without a doubt an uninformed homophobe.
Do you have any stats to prove your case? There have been many studies to prove that gay parents are significantly more likely to abuse their children. Here’s the paper: https://sci-hub.st/10.2466/pr0.96.1.227-230 It’s proven by the Illinois Department of Children & Family Services.
What is it that you want me to take away from that article? Citing something, but not providing any quotes doesn’t really help me much to understand your point.
That’s over 20 years old and from a time when gay marriage wasn’t legal.
Do you see how maybe that could skew the results and misrepresent homosexual couples?
You can literally read the abstract in that paper.
Illinois was the first state to allow sodomy in the US, here is the wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Illinois
“Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1962, after Illinois became the first U.S. state to repeal its sodomy laws.”
Right, I know I can read it - I did read it. I’m wondering if you read it. Because this is the only article that shows up if you Google “Foster kids abuse homosexuality.” And I have a feeling you pulled the first article you saw without actually reading it.
It’s a small article, you should be able to pull out the quote you need really quick, right?
I’m not sure what your point is here but here you go: Illinois child services reported sexual abuse for 1997 through 2002. 270 parents committed “substantiated” sexual offenses against foster or subsidized adoptive children: 67 (69%) of 97 of these mother and 148 (86%) of 173 of these father perpetrators sexually abused girls; 30 (31%) of the mothers and 25 (14%) of the father perpetrators sexually abused boys, i.e., 92 (34%) of the perpetrators homosexually abused their charges. Of these parents 15 both physically and sexually abused charges: daughters by 8 of the mothers and 4 of the fathers, sons by 3 of the mothers, i.e., same-sex perpetrators were involved in 53%. Thus, homosexual practitioners were proportionately more apt to abuse foster or adoptive children sexually.
That is not at all saying homosexual practitioners were more apt to abuse foster kids. It wasn’t saying that at all.
Which part do you believe says that? Don’t give me a wall of text, give me the individual lines that you think supports your point.
And again, it’s a 20 year old article from before Gay marriage was even legal. Pretty sure a country that doesn’t accept gay people will be more likely to paint them unfairly as pedophiles.
Ok I think you are just trolling at this point. You can literally read the abstract in this paper: https://sci-hub.st/10.2466/pr0.96.1.227-230 on the first page on the first paragraph. If you can’t read, then that says more about you than it does about me.
The history behind LGBT is a bunch of trans people throwing bricks at cops. What’s not to like about that?
This is a hatemonger using religion to justify their bigotry.
