Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoJudge rules White House pressured social networks to “suppress free speech”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down11cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partybecomeme@sh.itjust.worksworldnews@lemmy.mlglobalnews@vlemmy.net
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-linkJudge rules White House pressured social networks to “suppress free speech”arstechnica.comUllallulloo@civilloquy.com to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partybecomeme@sh.itjust.worksworldnews@lemmy.mlglobalnews@vlemmy.net
minus-squareBlamemeta@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·1 year agoWell yeah, no shit. We have the receipts, so to speak. Course the lefties won’t listen to him.
minus-squareBombOmOm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoI remember when this story broke a few months ago and everyone was denying how the White House totally wouldn’t tell social media companies to delete and control speech they don’t like. Yet, here we are with it being proven in court.
Well yeah, no shit. We have the receipts, so to speak. Course the lefties won’t listen to him.
I remember when this story broke a few months ago and everyone was denying how the White House totally wouldn’t tell social media companies to delete and control speech they don’t like. Yet, here we are with it being proven in court.