The AIDS epidemic has killed more than 40 million people since the first recorded cases in 1981, tripling child mortality and carving decades off life expectancy in the hardest-hit areas of Africa, where the cost of treatment put it out of reach. Horrified, then-President George W. Bush and the U.S. Congress two decades ago created what is described as the largest commitment by any nation to combat a single disease.

The program, known as the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, partners with nonprofit groups to provide HIV/AIDS medication to millions around the world. It strengthens local and national health care systems, cares for children orphaned by AIDS and provides job training for people at risk.

Now, a few Republican lawmakers are endangering the stability of the program, which officials say has saved 25 million lives in 55 countries from Ukraine to Brazil to Indonesia. That includes the lives of 5.5 million infants born HIV-free.

      • avonarret1@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s funny to me that it’s socialist oriented spending, which in relation is a drop in a bucket, is so controversial but everything else is okay. It is not even funny how huge the disparity is. But yeah, it is such a no-go to do good things… man, the gymnastics involved to reach that level of thinking are so stupid, it should be comical

    • SirWifflesprouts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one lives in isolation. Even if you don’t see the value in humanitarian efforts and even if in your selfishness you don’t have the selfish wisdom to support US soft power projection, you should be smart enough to realize that the US does not exist in an impermeable bubble. Global health improves health at home.

      • Elivey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        I took medical anthropology recently and this is the best answer. Helping others, even if they seem too far away to affect you in your individualist isolationist country, will actually affect your health.

        • Narrrz@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve found it’s just an all around great policy in life to do good things for others, even if it seems like it doesn’t serve your interests, because these things have a way of coming back around in unexpected ways.

          or, in the case of a sexually transmitted disease, not coming around. who’s to say your next sexual partner mightn’t have gone on an overseas adventure, had a wild fling with a native, and if not for this policy, caught an STI?

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Why should I be concerned with my neighbour’s house being on fire?”

    • anthoniix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      HIV originally came here from another country. If we weren’t doing this it would just continue to spread.

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      why is the American taxpayer still on the hook for fixing potholes on other streets?

      Fucking idiot

            • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Calling HIV an STD like it doesn’t have a hundred other ways to be transmitted really downplays the seriousness, which seems intentional to me.

              Don’t be a douche. We help others because we can and because disease is a global threat.