I find this posturing by liberals very interesting. They complain when a Chinese source says anything about the US, since “of course” it would be biased against it, yet they have no such compunction when it comes to what a source like the New York Times or the Washington Post says about China. Given their own logic, it would stand that such a source would be biased against China (given the US has a vested interest in discrediting China), and thus wouldn’t be reliable at all (in fact, the only reliable source in such a scheme would be a totally disconnected third party, something which clearly doesn’t exist).