• pjhenry1216@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re setting up a theoretically boogie man that no one said exists and then setup the extreme opposite point of view. You’re annoying the people that are actually sane. You’re being dogmatic in your one views and too extreme.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a shitty response. You won’t make money if you design the app poorly and can’t maintain it.

        • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a business decision. Why would for example an app that’s only needed for a 24 hour event need to be maintainable?

          Sometimes it’s ok to take the money and run. Feel free to make your case, but it’s not a developer’s call to make.

          • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That sounds like bad business. No application is 100% unique in everything. Code reuse saves time. If you are unable to bring anything from one app to another, you’re doing it wrong.

            Let me guess though, I was right. You’re a manager not a developer.

            • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re a manager not a developer.

              You’re wrong. But the fact that you live this dichotomy so deeply is not a great sign.

              • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                ? I mentioned it twice. And you sounded like a manager a little bit in one comment, and then a lot in the followup reply to it. To the point it sounded like you were defending it. Making claims that developers aren’t allowed to make the choice you were saying to make. So it was really weird. I don’t even know how your stance makes sense from your point of view.

                Edit: and thanks for ignoring anything of actual value to reply to.