A Swiss International Air Lines plane arrived at its destination without a single checked bag onboard.

The plane arrived in Bilbao, Spain, on Saturday without any of the passengers’ checked bags. The bags were left behind in Zurich, Switzerland, Kavin Ampalam, a spokesperson for Swiss, told the news agency AFP.

Passengers waited in vain for more than two hours at a conveyor belt for their suitcases, according to the Swiss-German newspaper The Blick.

“There was a shortage of ground staff,” Ampalam told AFP. Ampalam said the flight departed without its 111 passengers’ suitcases “for operational reasons,” as the plane had to fly another set of passengers from Bilbao to Zurich Airport before it closed. Swiss was operating the flight on behalf of Edelweiss Air, Ampalam said.

Ampalam said the flight crew waited for “one hour and 16 minutes” for the ground staff to load the bags onto the plane before deciding to fly to Bilbao without them.

“We understand the situation is not favourable for the people involved, and of course we regret the inconvenience,” Ampalam told AFP.

Several passengers said the pilot in charge of the flight was apologetic over the delayed departure, but never mentioned leaving their bags in Zurich, according to Blick’s report.

  • maporita@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is what bugs me more than anything. They “know” my bag didn’t make the flight but instead of sending me a message (to the email / phone number I already gave them) they make me wait two hours on the ground after a one hour flight.

    • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Forget the contact details, captian could have informed it at any point during the flight but nope, can’t cause any problems that may affect their schedule.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The actual right response should have been not to depart. Or cancel the flight. What are 111 passengers going to do without their luggage at the destination?!

        • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s not entirely fair. I would rather arrive at my location without luggage than not at all. I can always get some cheap shirts and shorts or whatever at my destination. I can’t get my hotel, and other prepaid scheduled expenses fees back.

          • sudo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            9 months ago

            Which just reiterates the initial point, communication solves this.

            ‘hey guys, so, basically we can’t get your bags on the plane lolol wanna still go? Stay on the plane. Umad? Get off and get a refund’

            Wow. Hard stuff.

            • XTornado@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The issue with that, is that would cause more delays so them not telling people before departure makes sense. Not telling them on arrival is stupid.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sure. But that’s you. And probably me. But we don’t represent all possible, legitimate scenarios.

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Read the article if they had not taken off at that time they wouldn’t have made the return flight in time (Zurich airport has no landings past midnight). So not flying means that 111 people would not make it to Bilbao (without their bags) and a similar amount of people wouldn’t make it to Zurich (with their bags).

          Personally, I would rather take the flight and get my bag a day or two later. Annoying af yes but at least you get some compensation to get some clothes.

          If half the people are flying home it’s not even that big of a problem.

          • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I agree, but I think it would be better to inform the passengers and give them a chance to alight.

            The problem there is that those passengers would demand a replacement flight or a refund, and we can’t have that, can we?

            • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Of course, informing them before take off would have been ever better. But then the plane still needs to fly, even if empty.

              And the passengers can still get compensation, maybe even more than the refund of the flight so I’m sure that for many of the passengers this was the better deal.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The crew fucking knew… like I kind of understand not saying it on the plane as some people might react badly or whatever but at least when they are on destination at least inform them…

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Exactly. If they’d have just said outright “look, we fucked up, your bags aren’t here, go to your hotels, and we’ll have them sent on tomorrow”, people would have been annoyed but could at least have enjoyed their holidays.

      The complete lack of communication from transport companies is beyond maddening. And it’s the same everywhere. When my train is “delayed”, I’ve no idea if that’s 5 minutes away or if it’s an inferno lying on its side on an embankment. The automated announcements will be the same either way.

    • quicken@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The one time I had a bag left behind I was flying into Narita airport in Japan. At the luggage carousel there was a person holding a sign with my name on it.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Checking bags is bullshit.

      Let some high school dropout from the TSA search your bags while you get foot fungus.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The TSA is in the USA only. The TSA is an American government department. They do not exist in Switzerland or Spain, two countries which are not the USA.

  • awwwyissss
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ahhh, finally some truly important world news.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I clearly missed the memo where the world news need to be important and not just news from around the world like idk it says on the about part of the subreddit.

      Maybe you should create /c/importantworldnews or something instead of complaining.

  • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of course we regret the inconvenience” is so disingenuous. Just shows how procedural this response was. To me, it reads as “We regret the inconvenience because we have to, not because we actually give a shit.”

    • explodicle@local106.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Once they minimize it as “the inconvenience”, I’m already hopping mad. They don’t know how badly I wanted the thing we agreed to before money changed hands. They act like the consumer surplus of the trade is zero; that all you’ve lost is some pittance and not the opportunity to solve your problem in a better way.

      They won’t say “our mistake” or “our choice” because that would be actually owning their own fuckup.

      End all airline subsidies.

      • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        Personally I think they should give a shit about failing to provide one of their most basic services. But I’m under no illusions that they ever will…

  • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    9 months ago

    There is no such thing as a labor shortage. There is only a wage shortage caused by the airline. Stop pushing costs down to the point you can’t operate, you twats.

  • espentan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I can’t recall the last time I traveled with checked luggage. It has its disadvantages, for sure, but flying is a terrible enough experience without having to stand in line waiting to check luggage, and then standing around waiting for it to (maybe) appear on a conveyor belt.

        • stealthnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          I almost never checked bags prior to having a child but there’s been plenty of times where the airline checked my bags at the gate because the overheads were full so I quickly learned it’s something you can’t count on.

          • GBU_28
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Unfortunately that’s gotten me to pay for priority boarding group now

      • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        My wife and I just flew with 2 kids and no checked bags. Yes, it was a pain to manage 4 carry-ons and 4 personal bags, but it was manageable, and it beat the hell out of paying another $200 to have those 4 bags checked.

        Edit: They’re 6 and 8 years old. It’s impossible for me to say whether it would have been possible when they were younger, as my 8-year-old is only recently past her medical issues that necessitated considerable additional luggage – so we just didn’t fly.

      • Ghoti_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I went to Disney for a week with my 1 year old and wife. We used 2 carry one and a personal bag.

        I refuse to take checked bags because I travel off and on for work and I’ve been burned too many times with checked bags.

        It’s pretty easy to pull off if you just do things like sleep in the clothes you plan on wearing the next day or only bringing enough diapers and wipes for the plane and buying a weeks supply at your destination.

        • stealthnerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Your didn’t have a car seat with you? I can see getting away without a stroller if you use a carrier but no car seat isn’t an option.

            • stealthnerd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t know, I’ve never looked into it. Unless you can rent them at the airport though I don’t see it being helpful.

              Sometimes you can book a car service in advance that will provide one.

              Regardless it’s going to be extra cost and something extra to worry about when you arrive which isn’t worth it to me personally.

          • Ghoti_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Car seats and strollers are gate checked (different imo) at most airlines

            The chance of a gate checked item getting lost or forgotten is near zero in my experience

            • stealthnerd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Car seats are not gate checked. Strollers can be since parents use them up until boarding but car seats are checked with the rest of your luggage.

              Edit: I forgot to account for car seats that are part of a stroller… I imagine those would have to be gate checked as well. That’s a special case though.

          • timespace@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Those get checked at the gate as you board the plane and are the first thing off the plane and waiting for you in the tunnel as you deboard.

            • stealthnerd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You retrieve them from baggage claim just like everyone else, at least that’s been my experience across multiple airlines.

              • timespace@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Interesting, because that has not been my experience with multiple airlines. I have always checked it at the gate, and dropped it off at the end of the tunnel just before boarding the plane. Then, during deboard, it’s waiting for me at the same spot, in the tunnel just outside of the plane. This has been the case with Southwest, Hawaiian, Alaskan, and Delta (I think? That flight was 5 years ago so I might be wrong on the airliner, I forget).

        • Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Too risky depending on your destination. What if there is a plane delay, what if there is no food for your baby, what if they don’t sell the food your baby is used to etc etc. usually just the baby stuff takes a while checkin luggage, not to mention the stroller.

          • Ghoti_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            1 year olds can eat a very wide range of foods as long as they’re served right so it wasn’t an issue.

      • Bonifratz@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        My wife and I have done several trips with our two kids (born 2018 and 2020) and have never checked in anything. It’s absolutely doable if you pack wisely.

    • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Great when you can manage it, they often take my carry on luggage from me and insist on checking it. Had musical instruments forcibly checked like that against written policy and paid-for permissions several times now.

      Also, some people like owning scissors. Or just have kids and need the extra luggage space.

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        Don’t forget wheelchairs.
        You are forced to check what is essentially your legs that in almost all cases is personalised for your specific needs (so you can’t just sub in a generic chair) and often costs thousands if not tens of thousands, yet airlines lose or damage hundreds of wheelchairs and scooters every month in the US alone.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or just have kids and need the extra luggage space.

        I wouldn’t check my kids tbh. They’re just going to cause a mess during loading.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I only check bags, for the exact same reason. I realized that some of my biggest stressors in traveling were getting everything to fit on a carryon-plus-backpack, and worrying about getting room in the overhead compartment. I’d rather stand around a carousel for fifteen minutes before walking to grab an uber than have to deal with that. I did the opposite for many years while business traveling on multiple flights weekly, and I just got tired of it. Different people have different tolerances for different things.

      I do have to say that, after hundreds of flights, I had my bags lost exactly once. Fortunately it was on a flight home, so other than having to wait at the airport until midnight when they finally acknowledged they lost my suitcase, and having to receive my suitcase two days later at 10 pm from a sketchy guy in an unmarked white van that the airline sent out, it was okay. In that time, I’ve had two or three colleagues have their bags go missing on the way to a meeting /conference, and that’s with the combinatorial aspect to the problem. It’s a pain, but you wind up with a story and a new outfit, and most people you’re meeting with will understand the issue.

  • ThePac@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    All it would take is a little COMMUNICATION and it wouldn’t be an unacceptable situation, but here we are.

    • Syldon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Someone has actually closed that baggage door knowing that there was not a single suitcase in there.

  • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Circumstances like this are why I fly with only 1 small carry-on. I’m too paranoid to ever check a bag and haven’t in over a decade.

  • Poiar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This is why we need more high speed trains. Can’t forget your luggage when you have it with you at all times

    • IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And they are being built and encouraged in Europe. I’d recommend anyone travelling within Europe first check for train routes before booking a flight.

      That said, while they are improving the situation, building new rail lines, tunnels, bridges, etc., and changing the regulatory environment to allow more competition, these are slow improvements to make.

      I checked and Zurich-Bilbao has few high-speed sections. They’re building new high speed lines near Bilbao, but infrastructure takes time…

  • FiftyShadesOfLatte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Last week, I flew with Swiss Air and it was the same story. They wanted me to check my carry-on bag, but I wasn’t having it—no telling what issues that could’ve caused. The flight was delayed for over an hour due to a lack of baggage handlers. Then, to add insult to injury, Zurich Airport apparently can’t handle wind coming from certain directions, leading to even more delays. I sprinted through customs to catch my connecting Swiss Air flight, only to find out it was also delayed. So much for Swiss punctuality.

    • LordR@kbin.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fun fact Swissair was the high quality Swiss airline for decades. Then they went bancrupt and Swiss was created. It is way worse. Air trafic wise Switzerland doesn’t have a lot to offer.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Several passengers said the pilot in charge of the flight was apologetic over the delayed departure, but never mentioned leaving their bags in Zurich, according to Blick’s report.

    Yeah… that really sucks probably a good call on the pilots part to be honest.

  • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Happened to a friend from europe to south America. He had less than a day for find equipments for the next gig of his crew.

    • MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s novel. One bag left behind isn’t news (looking at you Lufthansa you bastards); all the bags left is new, therefore news.

      • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        if you’re definition of news is “this could be featured on the local news to fill in for an otherwise slow newsday” then yes techinically it could be news. If your definition of news is “substantially noteworthy information” than this is most certainly not news

        • XTornado@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          […] and if you people look at your right you can see the one guy who decides what it’s “substantially noteworthy information” and what not.

          • Is he the only one?
          • Yes, it was discovered by scientists when checking a Lemmy post.