I know it is a known Classic but i liked Animal Farm so much i had to share. Before reading i thought that it would be similar to 1984 or Brave new world which it kind of is but its also very very different. Right from the Beginning i was hooked. I really love Orwells Books but this one is my favourite. I did not expect that. So for anyone that did not yet read it, i highly recomend it! :)

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I was a kid, my grandfather would record cartoon movies from TV to VHS and when we visited I’d watch those. One of them was an adaptation of Animal Farm. Of course I was way too young to understand any deeper implications of the work, but it did leave a deep impression on me. It is not suitable viewing for young kids.

    As an adult I read the book and I really enjoyed it. I join OP in recommending it. It is also not a long book, so it’s not a serious time investment if you don’t happen to enjoy it.

  • GreyShuck@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One of the very few that I had to read at school but enjoyed anyway.

    I noticed that a new book taking up the story of Manor Farm as a post-Brexit satire has been published just this week: Beasts of England. Obviously I don’t expect it to be in the same league as Orwell, but I am actually intrigued to read this, and will get my hands on a copy soon.

  • MinekPo1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just as an FYI Orwell was kinda a horrible person. You can still enjoy his literature if you want but he couldn’t help to find Hitler unlikable, was a colonial cop in India and didn’t like how the Hindi people treated him because of it and and made lists of people who he accused of being leftists and Jewish.

    • LiberalSoCalist
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      couldn’t help to find Hitler unlikable

      I think you meant, to quote Orwell himself:

      I should like to put it on record that I have never been able to dislike Hitler.

      More on the list in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orwell's_list

      There is a notable and obvious overlap in Orwell’s notebook between many of 1940s London’s prominent gay, Jewish and anti-colonial public figures and the accused “cryptos.” Orwell’s bigoted commentaries fill his suspects notebook. Jews are clearly labeled (“Polish Jew,” “English Jew,” “Jewess”) whilst others were mislabeled (“Charlie Chaplin — Jewish?”). The African-American bass singer and future civil rights activist Paul Robeson finds himself in Orwell’s list with the note “very anti-white,” whilst the half-Jewish poet Stephen Spender is damned as a “sentimental sympathiser… tendency towards homosexuality.”

      It’ll always be funny that the dude who wrote something like 1984 was such an eager proto-McCarthyite snitch for the propaganda unit of the British Foreign Office.

    • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would have thought finding Hitler unlikeable would be a positive attribute ? Was that a typo ?

      Orwell was a socialist so making lists of leftists seems surprising; are you sure this wasn’t an ideological tankies vs socialists or marxists vs trotskyists ?

      • Andjhostet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Orwell paraded as a socialist which is why he knew who were true leftists and who weren’t. Dude was a narc of the highest order, and a traitor to the cause any way you look at it.

  • vsh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Removed by mod

      • Andjhostet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s literally the most basic and textbook form of allegory you can find in literature. There’s absolutely no depth to it at all.

      • vsh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Removed by mod

      • vsh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Removed by mod

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think they mean the concept of “teenagers” as a specific phase wasn’t around (or well known) by that time