• Justice@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know memories are tiny and all that, but has the concept of mutually assured destruction completely left the “journalist” class’s brains? They do understand China and the US both have ICBMs and thus any aggression from either side may well escalate to thermonuclear war and the complete destruction of the earth… right? Like, everyone knows this. So when you type out anything along the lines of “prepare for US war against China” you’re also writing “prepare for nuclear holocaust.”

    This warmongering against China is completely deranged and if I were writing a fictional book, which I am, a completely fictional and made up book, one of the fictional characters protected under the first amendment (allegedly) would advocate, again, in a book, that anyone with a meaningful “platform”, Chinese citizen or American, who instigates war between the two countries be summarily executed. A couple Fox News idiots and Elon Musk, in a book, being shot live on tv would be far preferable to whatever the fuck is happening. These pieces of dogshit aid the military and CIA in every. Single. War and whatever else bad and nothing or very little ever happens to them. A fictional character seeks to change that.

    • COMHASH@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you know what is deranged? Westerners calling close the sky and bomb Russia knowing fully that Russia has the highest nukes in the world along with hypersonic glider vehicle.

      • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are so used to war being something that happens There and not Here that they cannot comprehend it actually affecting them. War happens on TV or in the arms manufacturer’s bank accounts, not at home.

        They also probably believe their own propaganda that Russia is so outdated that none of their arsenal would work.

        • COMHASH@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man, the concerts for #closeTheSkyortheChildrenWillDie was too surreal. Even when Putin raised the nukes for highest alert 🚨 the psychos were like… Yeah we have nukes too…

    • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We have to realize that the oligarchy is deranged and would rather slaughter the planet then give up even a fraction of their power. They think they will safety slip away to their bunkers in Africa and the Nordic countries where they expect to live like small lords, paying off what little is left of humanity to serve them.

      We can only hope when they do they get their throats slit in the middle of the night by one of their “servants.”

      • 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t have to be a crater. Our power grid is so fragile that taking out about a dozen specific sub stations would wipe power out for most of the country for upwards of 18 months assuming we had full use of the military to begin repairs. In that time it’s estimated 80% of the population would die. Unfortunately it would be all the poorer, working class people as the rish would jump ship and/or hide away.

  • lorty@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Armchair specialists: China and the USA will fight to the death!

    Reality: USA will bomb Taiwan back to the stone age before China can retake control of it.

    • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not even sure the US can bomb Taiwan, it’s so close to the shore that the PLA can defend it pretty efficiently I would think.

      • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US also officially recognises Taiwan as part of China, too, right? So if the US bombs Taiwan, that’s essentially declaring war on China. It’ll be gearing to get China to do the bombing but China won’t fall for it. All it has to do is wait it out. Meanwhile, the US is fighting itself, the planet, and most of the world for its own survival. Edward Gibbons’ History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire will be turned into a movie to be played around Hallowe’en in the US within the next few years.

        • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          They recognize that there can only be one united China yes, so if they attacked Taiwan it would be considered an attack on the PRC. They’re so slimy they would probably refuse the one china principle and declare the ROC something weird like “Non-administered territory” or something, like Bush did for “enemy combatant” which has become accepted in common discourse 20 years later it’s crazy.

          But likewise the PRC considers Taiwan to be theirs and would defend it. They also consider the people living in Taiwan to be their citizens, so I assume they would organize evacuations of the island in case of war. They probably have plans drawn up already to make it efficient. As for the ROC army… they would disband in 48 hours tops lol.

      • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not really WW2, you can just have planes, subs, or ships launch missiles from 100km out. You can’t intercept them all, or many of them for that matter.

        • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are systems to intercept missiles in flight, the US has the Patriot for example. Taiwan also conveniently sits around 100 miles (160km) of the mainland, not far at all to be deploying ships, planes and other defense systems from the shore.

          China has one major advantage too, hypersonic* missiles.

          • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Everything you said is true, but still missile interception is a risky business, if not just a “pray to god you can shoot it down” event. Plus a high altitude bomber or sub can fire cruise missiles from a 1000 km away before quickly turning tail or slipping deep into the dark pacific, so interception would be difficult there are well.

            Plus American interceptors out of Guam, Japan, Okinawa, Korea, or even Taiwan itself would complicate things significantly.

            But you are right that Taiwan would be generally easier to defend.

            However I doubt that the US has lagged behind in supersonic missile development, because if one thing, they absolutely love their weapons of war.

            A war would be a shit show and Taiwan would probably be devastated either way. Either by a Chinese assault, or an American retaliation or counter assault.

            It’s also concerning to think that it might just become a stalemate. The Chinese Navy would probably turn the US Navy to scrap, but at the same time how would a Chinese amphibious force fare against a city/mountainous terrain target that’s bristling every 3 meters with artillery, SAMS, tanks, anti ship launchers, AA, and Taiwanese/American soldiers?

            • olgas_husband@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              not wanting to be an armchair general, since i don’t understand much about military things.

              i make a guess that china has logistical advantage, continuous delivering ammo and weapons, they have a insanely strong industrial capability, and in a time of war that can be converted to, high speed trains make sure the equipment arrives safe and fast, while usa produced equipment would need to be delivered mostly by the pacific ocean since they don’t have a reliable way to deliver to a landmass close to taiwan and just finish the deliver by water, and chinas navy is very active in the pacific which can make such deliveries hard, i think for something to be delivered safe and quick, would be by diverting equipment from south korea or japan

            • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              China has th benefit of not needing to win, they only need to create the conditions for the USA to collapse. If they scrap the US Navy, it’s not hard at that point to just put things in stalemate and let the West falls apart.

              • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yes, but then you enter a war of attrition which has its own host of problems. After a while war exhaustion would steadily increase, and the impact of a war on china’s/the US’/the worlds economy would be devastating.

                It would be a lethal game of Chicken.

                • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t think it would be chicken. Without a navy, the US can’t maintain supply lines to the Pacific theatre and they would need to open up a Western front and enlist Europe in the war. Japan and Australia would need to take over the Pacific front. This is why multipolarity and Chinese diplomacy are critical to ensuring that the USA doesn’t have a path to victory through these proxies.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      USA will bomb Taiwan back to the stone age before China can retake control of it.

      And blame China and every westerner will believe it.

    • ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s really incredible that even in a paper filled with statistics like this

      The DOD is the single largest consumer of energy in the US, and in fact, the world’s single largest institutional consumer of petroleum. Since 2001, the DOD has consistently consumed between 77 and 80 percent of all US government energy consumption.

      The language surrounding the military is so fucking glowing. Clearly the imperialist brainrot runs deep. Its disgusting the way they deepthroat the boot here. Look at this little gem for example.

      The US military is preparing for threats of attack from human adversaries including terrorists. The threats of terrorism and Russian, Iranian, Chinese or Korean aggression are all real, but terrorists and these countries are not certain to attack the US. Arms control and diplomacy can deescalate tensions and reduce threats. Economic sanctions can also diminish the capacity of states and non-state actors to threaten the security interests of the US and its allies.

      They spend the whole paper outling the incredible levels of US military pollution, while simultaneously defending it with fantastical chauvinist arguments. A truly insane juxtaposition.

      • Walter Water-Walker@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t assume the readers/hearers of the propaganda all believe it. The military must maintain recruitment numbers and they’ll spend a lot of money to do so. So we’ll hear a lot about how great they are. The DOD even spends a lot of time and money providing props and such for Hollywood movies. They even help edit the scripts to ensure the US military isn’t put in a bad light.

        It’s not that the brainrot runs deep. It’s more that the propaganda does. Don’t blame the people for the stuff they didn’t consent to.

        • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          On one hand yeah, USians are the most propagandized people on Earth. But on the other hand, they’re not that dumb. Recruitment rates are falling for a reason, everyone knows what the military is really for and what it’s doing abroad. The people that enlist are generally those who come from military families or who want the benefits.

          Sorry if I don’t sympathize with those who are ok with subjugating/murdering other people for their career. Or to make Dad proud or whatever

          • Beat_da_Rich@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            American here. A big reason as well is the military can’t even successfully bribe people anymore. It’s pretty widely understood, even among the dumbest and most indoctrinated here, that the US military leaves its veterans in the dust.

      • ieatpillowtags
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? It’s insane to think Russia or China might get aggressive, better put down our guns guys!

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wine cave warriors in my local area really want some le epic war they can watch on their screens and clink glasses to the death and mayhem, confident that Napa Valley will never be a target.