This link goes to Reddit, however, we have used a direct video link to avoid giving them ad revenue.

  • BigToe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s completely fair and very possible, but I do disagree morally that it’s better to have an abortion than to bring a baby into the world that isn’t wanted. Want should not dictate the viability of life nor the concept of basic human right to life. Most times the right thing isn’t easy or even what we want, but that should not get in the way of doing what IS right. Should there be better foster care systems and increased funding for both systems and families willing to foster/adopt? Absolutely. But the failure of our government to put spending where it should to assist with fostering/adoption and, as you mentioned, in education and standard of living, does not change the morality of the ending of a baby’s life through abortion.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a baby, it’s a clump of fetal cells that has a 75% chance of failing on its own even without an abortion.

    • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Adoption doesn’t change what pregnancy does to a woman’s body. Comments like these focus solely on the fetus and ignore the woman who can have life long consequences of simply carrying the fetus to term.