• phillaholic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’re making a very narrow point and asking people to just watch an entire YouTube channel (and one where the subject goes on and on and on an about everything) to hopefully find proof?

    • puppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Narrow point? The argument was that Google themselves don’t fix the smart watch, but Apple wouldn’t do such a thing. My point is that Apple does the same. How else would you want the counter arguments to be?

      I presentes you Louis Rosmann, a subject expert in the field and one of whole world’s leading advocate on right to repair. His channel has investigations on thousands of right to repair violations and scams from companies. What else would you expect? You don’t want trust a random commenter on the internet but you also don’t want to listen to the leading advocate in this domain either? Then maybe use the search function in YouTube, Google or in ChatGPT because please don’t expect the said random commenter to spend their own time curating to spoon feed you information.

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        if you have a timed stamp example of the point that would be one thing. Citing an entire channel, and particularly one where he rambles on forever is a bad source.