The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am describing the current situation. You are the one describing events you hope to occur.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          No I’m looking at this the way a lawyer does.

          You know, like for court.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That you think I am defending the people using Fry’s voice here is just further confirmation that you don’t understand what I’m saying.

              I’m saying there aren’t laws or standards that accurately restrict this usage, and that is a bad thing and why people are upset.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Here is current precedent:

                  This isn’t the first time technology and copyright law have crashed into each other. Google successfully defended itself against a lawsuit by arguing that transformative use allowed for the scraping of text from books to create its search engine, and for the time being, this decision remains precedential.

                  Please explain, in your view, the substantive differences.

                  Quote from here: https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property-problem