Amazon demands 30% share of ad revenue from TV networks’ apps::Australia’s free-to-air broadcasters are up in arms after Amazon demanded a 30% slice of any advertising revenue that passes through its FireTV devices. Financial Review said networks Seven, Nine, Ten and SBS had accused the parcels to showbiz company of a “cash grab” and “rent-seeking”. Amazon has set new terms of services that would require…

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean. Amazon. It never was about quality media. It’s always been about money.

  • dan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    9 months ago

    Surely those broadcasters will pull their streams (it’s not like they’re not already hurting), FireTV will get a reputation of having restricted access to broadcast TV, some people will live with it and some will buy a smart TV and not worry about Amazon any more…

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Pretty much. I currently use fire sticks with Kodi side loaded for TV because it’s a pretty cheap decent android TV device. If it became restricted in this way such that apps I do want to use go away, I’d just buy a generic Android TV device (or side load them).

      This is just another of the long line of bad ideas big business seem to be having to try to get every last cent out of a product or service they can. It’s too far and we can easily avoid it.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Amazon must be forcibly split up.

    Same for meta

    Same for alphabet

    Same for Microsoft

    Same for a number of large airlines

    Same for all mega corps

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What’s going on in the tech sector is there a global EMP comming that only top ceo’s know about so they’re all pumping and dumping their products in one last cash grab? :D

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The free money faucet that came with 0% interest rates has been turned off. Venture capital are now actually demanding returns, thus the big tech companies are sucking the good will and future of their businesses dry in order to turn a profit.

      • SPOOSER@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I want to have this level of belief. After Netflix benefitting from their enshittification, I believe this will just become the new norm and I’ll just be pushed further from societal norms because I’m not willing to shell out for all of this bullshit, while the vast majority of society is. I want to believe these companies will fail in their ventures to treat their customers like shit, but if I’ve learned anything it’s that society will do anything for their shit.

        • phillaholic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Large companies will survive. Small ones will fail. A few medium ones with fail too. Amazon doesn’t have to make prime video successful as long as they prop it up with prime shipping.

          • cmbabul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            And the logical conclusion is the further consolidation of power in a handful of massive companies like in dystopian scifi

            • phillaholic
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yup, and the solution to the problem already exists. Break them up, or better yet, don’t let them buy each other up in the first place.

  • JakenVeina
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do you want to kill FireTV? Cause, that’s how you kill FireTV.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      FireTV was ever alive?

      I got one years ago and it was borderline unusable even from day one. They’ve always been these cheap, nasty, HDMI sticks that freeze and lag at the slightest hint of you wanting to actually use them to watch anything.

      • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The home application is TERRIBLE on Fire TV. It took three generations of the Fire TV stick before one of them was powerful enough to load that bloated nonsense they call an interface.

        Edit: I meant interface, not internet.

    • ██████████@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      firetv only exist to be cracked. although i suspect there is a captive audience of less tecgy people. as they sell their junk for 10 bucks and massive tvs for 💯 bucks

  • Discover5164
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    i guess my jellyfin app will have to share 30% of nothing with Amazon

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s the other way round:

      Most TVs now ship with unbelievably crappy OSes, so most people plug some kind of smart device(s) in front of them, sooner or later. Fire sticks, chromecasts, Netflix boxes on Android, etc.pp.

    • there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Mmm not really so, at least in my case. The tvOS is usually only supported for a few years and once the updates stop, apps stop their support as well. We have a tv in our living room that stopped being supported after six years; it can’t download Disney+ or certain other apps natively because of it. A Fire stick is much cheaper than having to buy a new tv every so many years.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I still have my plasma TV from 2011 (hey, the thing refuses to die, OK!). When I bought it, it was a “smart tv”. Now, there’s no apps for the thing. But I use a fire TV stick with side-loaded extra apps and it’s like having a modern smart TV.

        I don’t think I’d buy a TV for its smart features ever. Far better to get a TV for the picture quality and what actually matters in a TV and use devices to fill in the rest. Sure if they’re there and working I’d use them perhaps. But, I know they will become obsolete too soon.

      • realharo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        But most people just buy a Chromecast in that situation.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          eh no, most people buy whatever is sold to them. on amazon (which is quite popular) they sell you a fire tv stick

          google does an absolutely terrible job of selling androidtv/chromecasts so people don’t really even know what it is.

  • scmstr@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lol imagine a new product demanding this.

    Lol now imagine an incredibly shitty existing product that is already replaced by superior products and internalized software in even the cheapest tvs demanding this.

    The Amazon stream stick doesn’t even offer anything of value as it is.

    Is enshittification just extortion at this point?

  • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Capitalism eating itself, only if it was not harming innocents while it finished itself

  • bookmeat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I remember reading last year that all the assistant services like Alexa and Siri and Google are costing these companies a fortune with almost zero return. It’s not surprising they’re looking for additional revenue streams.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s really just Alexa that is having a problem. They sold a shit load of Echos at a loss, assuming people would use Alexa to buy stuff. Turns out people wanted Alexa to tell them the weather, play music and answer simple questions, not pitch them product recommendations…

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Amazon’s product recommendations are ad placements anyway. Almost never is is right.

  • NuPNuA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      In my experience the TV apps are insanely slow and cumbersome. I’ll always grab a cheap chromecast/firestick over using some abandoned TV streaming app that needs 2 updates and a restart before launching YouTube.

      • NuPNuA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      In addition to firetv being built into many tvs the built in apps on smart tvs are slow compared to a lot of external devices. They also send a lot of data back home and the ones not based on a big platform don’t get updated as often or have the same amount to choose from.

      I have apple TVs and even the older models from 2015 is faster than smart tvs I’ve used.

      • NuPNuA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          My mom’s LG is so slow it was rage inducing and it’s a new tv. My Samsung is better but still not great. The remotes are both terrible and neither is anywhere near the speed of an old apple tv.

          There’s also still privacy issues. One of the reasons the TV’s are cheap these days is because they sell your data.

          • NuPNuA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            deleted by creator

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not giving my TV internet access to it can download ads and remove features through updates.

      I’m also not going to use any major tech corporation proprietary device to stream.

      I’ll just connect a small computer I can manage myself, with a full wireless keyboard and mouse, that can run any app I so desire.

      • NuPNuA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • greenskye
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Are people actually using the built in apps over a dedicated box? I figured most people had a dedicated streaming device for at least their main TV. So much faster, better updates, more consistent (and with things like Apple TV I think the only way to access the platform)

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        apple ported their streaming services to everything, it’s not only available on apple hardware fwiw

        but no, most people just use whatever their tv does. tech people don’t obviously but most people do

        • greenskye
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hmm, guess I’ve just influenced everyone I know enough to use the boxes. The only people who don’t that I know are also traditional cable only people and don’t use streaming services at all.

      • NuPNuA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Never did it before so idk what I’m missing. My pc is middle of the line anyways so idk. And Baldurs Gate 3 is the first new AAA game I’ve bought in quite a while and my tv isn’t even close to the top of my issues with it (crashing regularly).

          So yeah when this monstrosity gives up the ghost I’ll probably buy a fancy new tv with all those features assuming the wife is cool with me getting that and as big as my current one (I inherited the current one). But idk I can see the stuff on screen ok enough, and I assume off the shelf sound hasn’t gotten much better, especially if you’re routing from headphone Jack to hearing aids like I do. I can see what’s going on and enjoy the stories. It’s not like I’m using 360i resolution or something.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah I got none of that. I do have a large red spot of burn in that’s slowly fading that I’m pretty sure is why my aunt was looking to give it away. It’s got a few display modes that generally suck. I’m pretty sure it was my aunt and uncle’s first non interlaced tv. But it’s got a few hdmi slots so I can plug in my computer and game on the couch.

          I’m sure all those features are nice and all. And when my monstrosity dies I’ll probably buy something nice with those features and I’m sure my wife and I will love them. But that’s kinda the awesome part of holding on to old crap forever, when it finally does die what you get is really nice to you even if you cheap out. I thought getting 10-15 years of hearing aid advancement at once was nice, but I suspect 20 years of tv advancement will be mind blowing, and probably make me upgrade my pc monitors. But as for now my tv is 5’, heavy as fuck, and it works fine if you know how to mess with it right

    • WhipTheLlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Bell TV in Canada doesn’t support Samsung TVs because Bell is stupid. The only option is to use an external device. It’s a good thing I don’t care about their TV app. I only have access because it comes free with fibre internet.

      • NuPNuA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator