• TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Punch Nazis is a good start.

    And by that I mean be socially intolerant of intolerance. Personal morals and actions don’t need to and shouldn’t be held to the same standard as the US Federal government.

    • nybble41@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Individuals do have more freedom to discriminate and show “social intolerance”, but that obviously doesn’t extend to punching people they disagree with. Or violent responses in general.

      • TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not morally obligated to debate someone arguing in favor of genocide, for instance. Is it legally assault to punch them, sure. Would I want the government to come in and boot stomp them, probably not. Is punching them morally wrong, nope.

        • nybble41@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The morals of your actions are for you to decide. It’s your conscience. However, if you punched someone over what they said they would be perfectly justified both in defending themselves against your aggression and in punching you right back. At that point you would have no objective rational argument that their defense or retribution was wrong which would not similarly condemn your own actions. You’re the one who chose to escalate to violence, not them.

          • TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            At least then they’re busy fighting me and not furthering the cause of horrific systematic injustices against those that can’t defend themselves.