• FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it’s really not that unreasonable. What the user thinks of as an app could be more than 1 program. It makes sense to put an abstraction between users and programs because lots of sophisticated software use separate programs that the end user doesn’t care about, just the whole.

        • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t think anyone’s saying we should only refer to each individual executable file. Just that ‘apps’ arbitrarily replaced the word ‘program’ with absolutely no change in definition to make it sound New and Marketable tm.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        An application program is a computer program designed to carry out a specific task

        A howitzer is a projectile weapon designed to fire a specific projectile

        Rejoice, your paint guns are now all howitzers!

        • RION [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thankfully the dictionaries get a little more specific. I do want an artillery capable paint gun though, that sounds rad

        • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Task Manager in Windows always had an “Applications” tab and a “Processes” tab, going back to Windows 98 at least. “Programs” was always too broad and restricted to being colloquial; the specific word was either application or executable.

          What’s worth ranting about is whether people have stopped understanding “App” as short for something.

    • Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The l33t w4r3z d00dz were calling applications ‘appz’ since at least the '90s. Then there was that brief period where Apple tried to claim “app store” was short for “apple store” so no one else could say it…

    • stilgar [he/him] @infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Some people” includes almost all devs who actually make the apps applications programs though.

      Many of the projects I work on use app to refer to the main object or entrypoint.

    • JokeDeity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude, me too, so much. Also I was made to feel real dumb trying to help my fiance last night with M$'s new Office. It’s an app first of all, so if Windows 11 doesn’t know already what to do with it with a specific file type you have to find it, but dumbass Windows 11 doesn’t let you just easily search for apps when you do “open with”, because that would make sense. So okay, I’ll open the file in Power Point. Where’s Power Point? Oh, you have to open the Microdick 365 app first, okay, click on PowerPoint in there and… it opens a mother fucking browser page. PowerPoint doesn’t exist as a program anymore, it’s a fucking web app.

      Why the fuck does anyone pay for Office now, it’s a terrible system, especially when so many better alternatives exist!