• aleph
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes sense to control for socio-economic development so that you can rule out other variables that would make the comparison less meaningful.

      • BearOfaTime
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        While ignoring other data points like miles driven, time spent in cars, etc?

        I mean, as almost always, single-metric comparisons are pretty much meaningless.

        Consider this: on a good day I can make it to work in 35 minutes, but I always consider it a 1 hour drive (especially in winter), because it can frequently take that long (50 minutes really, but I consider it killing an hour of my time). And I live in a large city - my job is 15 miles away.

        Other than China, I can’t really think of a country who has the space, drivers, and cars in a way comparable to the US. Australia has the space, but few people (by percentage of drivers) really drive the vastness.

        Consider this - in a western US state, it could take 3-5 hours to leave the state, at 70mph. This is with no stops. Kansas is an 8 hour drive, Texas is 2 days, realistically.

        Dallas to Austin is a couple hours (3 iirc), a good 4 or more to San Antonio. New York to Florida - 20 hours.

    • RNAi [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, it’s a valid division for analysis cuz in general income per capita seems like a strong explaining factor