California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • Alex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    It also says it’s so you can have well regulated militias but the wording is vague about the link between the two.

    • HelixDab2
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      In the context of the constitution, “regulated” means “trained”. So rather than meaning a militia that is heavily regulated by the state, they’re talking about trained people. Moreover, it was understood that the people that were being called up were armed with their personal weapons–not supplied by the gov’t–and that they were going to be shooting on their own time.

      The frames of the constitution intended the people to have access to military arms, to be training themselves in their use, and to be ready to use them at a moment’s notice.

      They opposed a standing military and police force for all the reasons that we’ve seen over the last (almost) 250 years.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        So does the training include keeping weapons safely and not waving them around in provocation? Are there mental health standards to meet? Or does it just mean someone knows where the trigger is?

        • HelixDab2
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          keeping weapons safely

          Interestingly enough, that was a legal obligation in the colonies; powder could not be stored in the house because it was an explosive risk. Currently, some states have safe storage requirements, but they’re legally unenforceable.

          waving them around in provocation

          That’s called brandishing, and it’s a crime by itself in most states.

          Most training starts with safety, and progresses through basic marksmanship. I learned most of that from my father, grandfather, scoutmaster, and the RSO at Boy Scout Camp, and it’s been further reinforced by every RSO at every range and competition I’ve been too.