cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/5431344

The enshittification of the internet follows a predictable trajectory: first, platforms are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die. It doesn’t have to be this way. Enshittification occurs when companies gobble each other up in an orgy of mergers and acquisitions, reducing the internet to “five giant websites filled with screenshots of text from the other four” (credit to Tom Eastman!), which lets them endlessly tweak their back-ends to continue to shift value from users and business-customers to themselves. The government gets in on the act by banning tweaking by users - reverse-engineering, scraping, bots and other user-side self-help measures - leaving users helpless before the march of enshittification. We don’t have to accept this! Disenshittifying the internet will require antitrust, limits on corporate tweaking - through privacy laws and other protections - and aggressive self-help measures from alternative app stores to ad blockers and beyond!

  • relay@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    He is a useful tool for pointing out the thesis and antithesis for the revolution. He contributes to the revolution by pointing out those problems earnestly. However what can be given by bourgeoisie politicians can be taken away by bourgeoisie politicians. Those of us on the western left need to provide that synthesis in a manner controlled by a proletarian party.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah the first half—the problem statement—is really good. As a tech worker at ground zero since the mid-90s, I’ve been following Doctorow for decades. He’s not necessarily a dirty pinko but he knows his stuff.