• bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Right. You don’t have to explicitly say it for it to be true.

    If you’re against AI taking white collar jobs, but not blue collar ones, then “you’re okay with blue collar jobs being automated but not white collar ones.”

    Lol. Not sure why this needs to be spelled out for you so many times.

    Probably because you don’t like what’s being said and need to remain cognitively dissonant.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re inferring positions I haven’t taken, and then insisting I have taken them when I clarify that is not my position.

      Notably ironic that the term “cognitive dissonance” occurs to you in this context.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, you’re not against AI taking white collar jobs?

        Or you’re not okay with machines replace blue collar jobs?

        Which is it? Say your stance instead of beating around the bush because you’re ashamed of it.

        Notably ironic that the term “cognitive dissonance” occurs to you in this context.

        How? It looks to me like you don’t even know what that means.