Yo I once asked you if you were a bot from my sh.itjust.works account and you assumed I was asking that because you post a lot of pro communism stuff but it was actually because you just post a lot. Anyway thanks for being apart of my radicalization, I likely would not have found hexbear and likely wouldn’t have questioned my own beliefs if I had not seen your posts so often.
He’s the test of our highly advanced Communism Bot program. Soon we will be staging a massive rollout of Yogbot 2000s worldwide to spread socialist decadence.
happy for your radicalization comrade! Even happier that you left sh.itsfull.ofnazis. that was interesting few days that we were federated with them lol
You say that like you engage with the perspective, but like two dozen people have tried very patiently explaining things to you only to get strung around indefinitely
Third campist bullshit is based on anticommunist distortions and is fundamentally more in line with the ideology of the State Department. Multipolarity will not be achieved by your book club.
If you think China is more anticommunist than NATO, you’re smoking crack. If you think even Russia, which is a liberal state that exists to not be the USSR first and foremost, is more anticommunist than NATO, you are smoking crack.
Who supports Cuba? Who seeks its destruction?
More importantly, and forgive me for not spelling this out for you before, China has more than a book club! It has a large military and many other practical things going for it that benefit multipolarity. Your book club has none of that, nor prospects at a fraction of it.
we’ve seen enough of polarization.
Classics in anarcho-bidenism. Silly me, I should have just thought of opting out of the world order because NPR tells me that “polarization” is bad and this “multipolarity” stuff sure sounds like it’s the same thing.
How would I have such comparisons? (It’s a rhetorical question btw)
There’s no reality with such cryptic assumptions and accusations anyway. You don’t have to play with these strawmen. Nobody should be forcing you to do such things
My point is that denying China’s status as a historically progressive force geopolitically or even vaguely insinuating that it is anticommunist in a way that is comparable to its opposition is hysterical, and if neither of those are what you mean, then what the fuck are you even saying?
I’m super clear and straight forward with what I’ve said, with no need for such comparisons or any insinuating. Btw the word you’re looking for is a regressive force (as are the other forces you’ve brought into comparison)
Nothing you say is ever straightforward. I can never understand you, and when I’ve asked for clarification you never respond except with more things that don’t make sense
“I am very clear. Here, let me falsely correct you about word usage, elliding the difference in position, to really demonstrate how clear and straighforward I am.”
Thank God we have you to remind us that bilateral development is regressive next to imperialism.
Thanks for the love comrade. Sometimes it’s fun to put those fallacies in light and counter with some unity & compassion. After all, it’s understandable and only human.
Yo I once asked you if you were a bot from my sh.itjust.works account and you assumed I was asking that because you post a lot of pro communism stuff but it was actually because you just post a lot. Anyway thanks for being apart of my radicalization, I likely would not have found hexbear and likely wouldn’t have questioned my own beliefs if I had not seen your posts so often.
Oh hey, that’s awesome to hear. Nice to know all my posting helped move at least one person left. :)
deleted by creator
o7
deleted by creator
that’s right, gotta make them sweet Xi bucks somehow 🤣
When you radicalize 10 people comrade Xi gives you a peck on the cheek and calls you a good girl/boy/etc.
kiss headpat
Good comrade
Yogothos is our scribe and arbiter of knowledge
that sounds like a lot of responsibility 😅
honestly just keep doing your thing, you’re doing excellent
thanks!
He’s the test of our highly advanced Communism Bot program. Soon we will be staging a massive rollout of Yogbot 2000s worldwide to spread socialist decadence.
Seriously though, Yog is a legend.
Hi new comrade, I see you’ve already helped yourself to a top shelf name
It was an inside joke between friends. Something something blahaj, something something dolphin pussy juice. But thank you :D
Go further and you’ll start seeing through the china marketing as well
You say that like you engage with the perspective, but like two dozen people have tried very patiently explaining things to you only to get strung around indefinitely
Third campist bullshit is based on anticommunist distortions and is fundamentally more in line with the ideology of the State Department. Multipolarity will not be achieved by your book club.
I don’t even know why you’re taking whatever it is on me.
China’s “book club” is anticommunist, we’ve seen enough of polarization.
If you think China is more anticommunist than NATO, you’re smoking crack. If you think even Russia, which is a liberal state that exists to not be the USSR first and foremost, is more anticommunist than NATO, you are smoking crack.
Who supports Cuba? Who seeks its destruction?
More importantly, and forgive me for not spelling this out for you before, China has more than a book club! It has a large military and many other practical things going for it that benefit multipolarity. Your book club has none of that, nor prospects at a fraction of it.
Classics in anarcho-bidenism. Silly me, I should have just thought of opting out of the world order because NPR tells me that “polarization” is bad and this “multipolarity” stuff sure sounds like it’s the same thing.
How would I have such comparisons? (It’s a rhetorical question btw)
There’s no reality with such cryptic assumptions and accusations anyway. You don’t have to play with these strawmen. Nobody should be forcing you to do such things
My point is that denying China’s status as a historically progressive force geopolitically or even vaguely insinuating that it is anticommunist in a way that is comparable to its opposition is hysterical, and if neither of those are what you mean, then what the fuck are you even saying?
I’m super clear and straight forward with what I’ve said, with no need for such comparisons or any insinuating. Btw the word you’re looking for is a regressive force (as are the other forces you’ve brought into comparison)
Nothing you say is ever straightforward. I can never understand you, and when I’ve asked for clarification you never respond except with more things that don’t make sense
“I am very clear. Here, let me falsely correct you about word usage, elliding the difference in position, to really demonstrate how clear and straighforward I am.”
Thank God we have you to remind us that bilateral development is regressive next to imperialism.
Lol absolute octopus ink cloud moment
Thanks for the love comrade. Sometimes it’s fun to put those fallacies in light and counter with some unity & compassion. After all, it’s understandable and only human.