Residents and local officials have long blamed the high number of cancer cases on contamination from a rail yard originally owned by Southern Pacific and later bought by Union Pacific near two historically Black neighborhoods, Fifth Ward and Kashmere Gardens. The wood preservative creosote, which has been associated with an increased risk of contracting cancer, was used for more than 80 years at the site until the 1980s. City officials say the contamination has reached the groundwater in the neighborhoods.

During a city council meeting in which the funding was approved, Mayor Sylvester Turner said Houston “has a moral obligation” to help relocate residents away from the four different cancer clusters that have been identified in recent years. Health officials have found higher rates of respiratory cancers as well as childhood cancers, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

  • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s great this is happening, but in a just world Union Pacific would be forking over $5MM, not everyone else.

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article says, “relocating families from among the 100 properties that have been affected by the contamination could cost up to $35 million. The city is looking at other sources, including federal funding, to help pay for the relocation program.”

      • brandon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you own a home in the area any equity you have there has probably been made pretty worthless. It would make it pretty hard to move if you couldn’t sell your home to afford another.

      • Lemonparty
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fuck you gonna buy house for <175K plus moving expenses? Not like you’re gonna be able to easily sell your house in THE CANCER ZONE.

      • Fixbeat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Houston, maybe 20. They’re working on getting more funding, according to the article, but they definitely need more.

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can’t they just take it from the company that profited off of pollution?

          • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they do, they’ll tie it up in the courts for decades. Meanwhile, people will be getting cancer and dying.

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course it just so happens they’ll be moving people from some of the poorest neighborhoods breaking up the community and diluting their votes elsewhere. It’s not specifically the reason for doing this, but is definitely a side effect