• Xianshi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Curious to see what it can emulate with the new specs. I have the steam deck now but the form factor or the pi was always nice.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well one of the biggest hurdles to performance on the old raspberry pies with single core performance. So due to the fact that it is a slightly newer node faster etc etc etc it should definitely be better

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, it apparently can’t do decent 8- and 16-bit anymore, since they’re ditching the composite video jack for hooking it up to a CRT TV. Now it’s only good for newer games designed for LCDs.

      • llii@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can still solder an video out to the Rpi 5, there’s just no port. So it’s still possible if you really want to.

        • HarriPotero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’ll get at least one frame of added latency in the very best case when using original hardware on an LCD. Combine that with a TV that does its own processing and emulation and you’ll have some noticeable input lag. And yes, I know most TVs have a game mode.

          Interlacing when doing sprite multiplexing looks shittier on an LCD, too. Unless you do blending at the cost of an additional frame of latency.

        • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They just don’t look the same. They were designed to be displayed on CRT displays, so the quality is actually worse on LCDs. Just look up pictures comparing the two.

          You can get a converter box for about $100 that makes it pretty close, though.

          • donuts@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            These days I’d much rather pay 8-bit games on a 65inch 4k tv via HDMI with shadow mask and (light) scanline emulation filters, than over composite video to a small CRT. To reach their own though.

            • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m pretty sure the filters you’re talking about are exactly what the converter I’m talking about does, if we’re not talking about the same thing (unless you’re talking about software filters)

              • donuts@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I use a project called MiSTer for most of my retro needs these days, but there are definitely a bunch of other upscalers and things that can create similar effects.

                Generally I find the quality of CRT emulation effects is much better, more accurate and more subtle than they used to be.

                Some people swear by real CRTs of course, but getting a good picture out of a good CRT is usually an expensive (or at least time sinking) endeavor. It usually involves RGB modding consoles, or at least getting something like S-Video out. Many of us grew up with composite video, but it’s pretty gnarly when you go back to it.